Hitler's New Fans

8/31/2025

It is natural and good that we revise our interpretations of past history now and then in the light of new evidence and the emergence of new perspectives on human affairs. But there seems to be going on at the moment a revisionism about World War II that is somewhat distorted in judging good and evil.

This new perspective is endemic in what is called the alternative right and is appearing even in more mainstream sources. This view suggests that the Allies were mistaken and corrupt in destroying Nazi Germany and thereby inflicted a grave damage on Western civilization that is responsible for our present troubles.

I was shocked and disturbed when this view emerged in response to a little something I wrote on what claimed to be a Southern site. I was attacked by numerous persons and ridiculed as a fool who did not understand history in my sympathy for Britain over Nazis. I have been defending the South for half a century. I thought I deserved a little respect on a “Southern” site. These were people claiming to be Southern. They are people afraid to use their real names. They differ in content but are similar in character to the horde of shallow leftist pseudo-intellectuals destroying civilised understanding by their distortions of history.

There are some elements in the Yankee national character that hint of fascism, but it is impossible to imagine anything more alien to the Southern tradition than goose-stepping German aggressors.

It is true that World War II turned out badly. It weakened the British, French, and Dutch empires, allowing Communism and chaos across Asia, and it gave much of Europe to the Soviet Union. But what happened later does not invalidate war against the Nazis. History often plays tricks like this.

According to our new revisionists, Hitler was a nice idealist who did not want to make war on Britain (as long as they agreed with him) and was only trying to save Europe from Communism. Britain declared war on him anyway. We are given pictures of a fat, corrupt, Jewish-controlled Churchill as responsible for starting World War II.

This is to misunderstand the situation of 1939 entirely. It had long been a standing principle that no one power should be allowed to dominate Europe. Hitler had already conquered and occupied much territory. The invasion of Poland against his own promise indicated a lasting threat. It is true that Britain and France could not help Poland and that they did not declare against the Soviet Union for taking part of that overrun country. But declaring war might deter Hitler from further invasions and the Soviets were not an immediate threat to Western Europe.

The Western powers were by no means perfect. There is no perfection among humans. But compared to the aggressive Nazi police state they were models of decent behaviour and constitutional government. It is true that the war damaged Britain, perhaps irrecoverably, but World War II was still their “finest hour,” deserving lasting admiration.

It is true that the Allies engaged in terror bombing of civilians, but the Germans started it.

And what about this resurrected Hitler? He created a police state that weighed heavily on his people, curtailing their freedom and demanding extreme and endless sacrifice, though being Germans many of them liked it.

Military genius he thought himself to be. He had some early successes due to the hesitancy of the Western powers to get into war again. But thinking he could conquer Russia in a few weeks - one of the stupidest delusions in the history of the world. He never understood Britain or Russia. Like all bad people he thought others had the same motivations as he did.

He continually overruled able and patriotic generals who understood his mistakes. In the latter stages of the war he was a weakened drug addict ready to sacrifice his people to the last man, woman, and child because they had failed his divine mission. And hiding in a bunker and escaping the consequences of his actions as his country collapsed. Some patriot! We cannot imagine such behaviour by Churchill or DeGaule.

The Germans should have overthrown the destroyer of their country by 1944, but they were too used to following orders and thinking of themselves as superior.

Part 1 of 2.

50 Comments

ID Reader

8/31/2025 11:10:25 pm

The comments section must have really chapped your hide for you to post this after the site has gone offline. I remember that article, and I remember the responses. The behavior you saw was a combination of several factors.

First, you conflated Southern Nationalists with Southern nationalists - that is, nationalists who happen to be Southern. Many Southerners in the dissident sphere are so disconnected from their own culture and history that it no longer occupies a place of primacy in their hearts.

Second, the deindividuation of Internet communication results in behaviors one would not exhibit in person. The sentiments would be the same, but they would have been less profane or insulting. Probably.

Third, with respect, I fear you're out of touch with the consequences of dissidence. Your public opinions are acceptable, so you don't have to worry about attaching your real name to them. Those that complain about anonymity or masks are typically not at risk of losing their livelihoods or being harassed by federal agents. The fact is that, from their perspective, your views are so milquetoast that they're not worth persecuting, and that means that they aren't a threat to the institutions that prevent you from getting what you want. Multiple members of that site were subject to just such a treatment, and that certainly wasn't an appropriate audience to lecture about the cowardice of anonymity.

Fourth, you overestimated the worth of your credentials. On the Internet, reputation exists in particular, not in general - and I believe many of them were actually unaware of you prior to your article, though I recall at least one who had some kind of animus against you in particular. When you talked about how much you deserved their respect with your fifty years of advocacy, what they heard was that you have, for fifty years, failed to advance your cause. In their lifetimes, the South, the Union, and the white nations of each have only degenerated. You entered a place with an open comments section and told them all that they were wrong, that you were right, and that you deserved their respect for saying so.

I understand that you are a respectable Southern gentleman and expect certain standards of decorum, but the Internet in general and the dissident sphere of it in particular does not share those standards. Those standards grow thin even in the real world, where the South is less Southern by the year - and so are the Southerners. You have to understand that the South you remember is the South we've lost and the South that has lost us. I still try to maintain a certain standard of decorum (and I hope I've demonstrated it here), but none of younger nationalists remember a time when such was the norm.

I agree that you were ill-used, and I am sorry, but that you expected otherwise is a symptom of this disconnect (though not a justification for the treatment). I would encourage you to reach out to P. M. if you wish to have a discussion about the reason you were met with such hostility. I suspect that both of you could provide some insight as to how the South has changed and why, and I would certainly be interested in reading or listening.

Joseph Johnson

9/1/2025 02:06:39 am

Dr. Wilson, not only the Alt right but some libertarians seem to think that Churchill was a nascent neocon.

Clyde N Wilson

9/1/2025 05:33:58 am

ID, I have probably never been in as much danger as the younger people, but my Southern stand has not been costless.. It is wrong to call bring Lee and Davis into alliance with Hitler. The closer connection is Lincoln and Hitler. It is wrong to connect the South with things totally non-Southern.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/1/2025 12:17:56 pm

We have a conundrum. What Dr. Wilson says about the Nazis in 1939 is correct. What the Nazis say about the Jews in America in 2025 is correct. So what do we do moving forward?

And Dr. Wilson is too humble to say, so I’ll say it. Dr. Wilson was pretty much pushed out the door at his college/university. Nes paid his dues. It cost him to take a stand. He’s right with 99% of what he says. I’m not a fan boy. He rarely responds to me. I’m adult. I don’t care. I’ll take his batting average any day and all day.

In ending, how do Southerners stay true to our roots, but also address the elephant in the room? American Jews are no friend to the Southerner. They may have been good Southerners in The War. But that war was 160 years ago. Go look at the recent authors advocating DIEversity in Japan!!! They all have a similar last name. What is their agenda? What is their end game? Without loyal and dumb Southerners they wouldn’t have any support in the world. So what’s their end game? Three red heifers?

Care to respond Dr.Wilson to these comments?

George Fitzhugh's Ghost

9/1/2025 01:51:28 pm

I assume this essay was aimed at the boys from Identity Dixie, a site I used to read, in wake of an exchange *last year* regarding Southerners and White Nationalism that occurred there. Why Dr. Wilson waited until the site was down to post this, when ID cannot officially reply, I do not know. Regarding his statement about "what claimed to be a Southern site", does a site cease to be Southern if it does not always defer to Wilson's Boomer era take on Jeffersonianism? Was ID still a Southern website when he positively reviewed the ID orbit book "An Honorable Cause" at Abbeville in May 2023, but ceased to be Southern when they did not get in line with his thoughts on race, WWII history, and the JQ?
Which leads me to (satirically) ask, is being a "true" Southerner just an ideology, impossible to be if one does not subscribe to a reverence for everything the (Christ's divinity denying Jefferson) said about politics and economics? Was George Fitzhugh, loyal Confederate during the war, still a Southerner when he wrote of Jefferson in the 13th essay of "Cannibals All!" that Jefferson was "invaluable in urging on revolution, but useless, if not dangerous, in quiet times"?
Regarding the statement "the Soviets were not an immediate threat to Western Europe" in 1939 I stand aghast. I am not a National Socialist. But one need not go full Corey Mahler to realize that Hitler was the lesser evil in WWII.
Regarding the statement "It is true that the Allies engaged in terror bombing of civilians, but the Germans started it", I ask: does Christian morality, that one should never attack and kill women and children, come into play here -and thus condemn both sides? Also, does the non-interventionist part of the "divine" Jefferson ideology not mean America should not have taken sides, should not have did lend-lease for Britian, and should have sought "peace, commerce, and friendship" with both Britian and Germany?
The tone and opinion that Clyde Wilson expressed in this essay on Hitler are the reason that nationalists (be they White, Southern, or Christian variety) under the age of 50, and especially those under 30, view Wilson and his writings as largely irrelevant to the conversation in 2025.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/1/2025 08:00:51 pm

Let me strike the tent, as Robert E. Lee said. Our ancestors were not Nazis. Call it jeffersonianism, federalism, Christian, etc. I assume you are taking the conversation to the logical conclusion: Nazism or Genocide?

Or is this just a discussion about the events of 1939? I could argue the greater threat was not the Nazis or Communists in Europe, but in hindsight, the ‘communists’ in colleges and universities of the Frankfurt School here in America. You all here know what I’m talking about.

And I do take issue with you referring to Dr. Wilson as a boomer. Does he sound like some one who would be on Fox News? Or watch Fox News? You know he’s not your typical boomer. Or do you mean just a boomer on the 1939 issue?

Perhaps the Christian Jeffersonians worship Jefferson too much. However, it is by far a superior form of community and governance than Nazism. Or Communism. Any form of Statism. I sadly fear as things get worse for people on our side that they will embrace more Statism.

Trump is a great example. Statism with him is good. It’s payback time. And the other side always breaks the rules and never plays by the rules and plays a zero sum game with our genocide as their ultimate goal. But once the other side gets in power, they will come after us. They have wicked devices planned for us.

A Jeffersonian tradition best preserves our liberties. And kith and kin. And our homeland. The problem has never been the Jeffersonian tradition. The problem has been Statism and Yankees.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/1/2025 08:37:01 pm

I would say his writings are even more relevant now than his writings from the 1970s and 1980s. Not only relevant, but full of great wisdom for us to follow. Yes, they may be too optimistic like Jefferson was of the agrarian voter. But in defense of Jefferson, don’t voting records of agrarian voters show they have greatly favored republicanism over Statism???

Yes, FDR Democrats are a blight on the record. But wasn’t it a decision to play a rigged game to push the chips onto your side also? The blue and red voting maps show that Jeffersonianism is still greatly alive. Rural vs. Commercial. Jefferson vs. Hamilton. It’s never gone away.

So is Dr. Wilson a boomer for his 1939 thinking or a boomer for his great insight into America from the 1970’s onwards? It appears you would say yes to both. But is he really? True, he may not be as ‘race conscious’ as you and I, but how are his views outdated? It would appear to me that it is Statism that is outdated. Wilson is quite correct in saying Lincoln Ahmad more in common with Hitler than our ancestors.

And regarding Fitzugh, a lot of what he says is true. And a lot of what he says is not true. Is returning to almost medieval feudalism truly the answer to our ills? I’ll take the heathen Jefferson any day over that option.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/6/2025 03:46:40 pm

Where did you go? You want me to do all the work for you? Unlike you, I don't waste my time listing evidence and being very intellectual anymore. It doesn't matter. To your defense, you come off much more civil and intellectual than me. I'm not that way anymore. I think the time for that has ended...feel free to come back and agree and disagree with anything I have written...

I'll just stop here...I have no more faith in the written word....

Clyde N Wilson

9/1/2025 02:41:01 pm

I don't want to exaggerate my losses. I was not pushed out of my university. Maybe I am outdated and irrelevant , now, but I think the more intelligent young people recognise the Abbeville position as our best hope. It is reality rather than ideology. Noone can be Southern and a Nazi at the same time.
I am glad we are getting some active commentary here and I hope it proves fruitful..
I did not wait for Id D to close down. I put some remarks on there at the time and have been watching commentary for a long time before writing.
General, If I replied to everybody who addresses me I would not have time for anything else.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/1/2025 07:38:32 pm

There’s no hurt feelings. I get it, Dr. Wilson Life is very busy. Family also is more important than ‘strangers’ over the internet. For the record, I embrace the Jeffersonian tradition. I despise Nazi ideology. My stomach turns every time I hear anyone, but especially a Southerner, talk that Nazi nonsense.

With that said, there’s a group of people out there who have their own homeland, refuse to live there, and hate us-promote our own genocide. And act upon it. People are tired of it. Unfortunately, some people ‘on our side’ embrace Nazism in frustration. Our ancestors were not Nazis, regardless of what woke professors and NAACP hustlers say.

As Orwell said, Nazism is just a curse word. It has no real meaning. I detest a future of Nazism. And it’s good young folks are hearing a better option with Professor McClanahon than Nazism. It will give our Southern folk a better alternative as things get worse. Professor Brion may not be as pithy as you, but I don’t care. I want a Free South. And I want Yankees in their graves. And I want all Jews to return to their homeland. Minus owning the institutions and factors of production here in America. All others are free to stay so long as those of White, European ancestry are in charge. I don’t know why Blacks don’t self-deport back to Africa since America is such a bad place according to them. But we all know the answer why not.

And for the record, I believe Professor Wilson is the premiere American thinker of the second half of the 20th century and beginning of 21st century, not Sam Francis. Him and I disagree on non secular Puritanism and the English Civil War, but that’s fine. Doesn’t change my high opinion of him. And I’ll be the first to defend him here if the Nazis show their pen around these parts on this page. God Save the South from Nazis, too.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/1/2025 08:09:48 pm

If you are a Southerner or just plain lover of liberty reading this post and comments, please don’t turn your back on the Jeffersonian tradition. And our Christian heritage.

Reject Statism. Reject Nazism. Reject Communism. Reject Jefferson’s optimism. Defend true federalism. Reject constitutionalism. It’s dead. As Rhett said, living men defend freedom, not dead parchments. Deo Vindice.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/1/2025 08:20:05 pm

Let me spit out this question: can the Jeffersonian tradition and/or true federalism exist in a non-homogenous society? Or are we doomed to embrace Nazism or Communism? Good day.

H. V. Traywick, Jr. link

9/1/2025 11:29:01 pm

"Can federalism exist in a non-homogenous society?" Good question, General! Leslie A. White, in his book "The Science of Culture: A Study of Man and Civilization, argues that cultures may be divided into three sub-systems: the technological, the sociological, and the ideological. The technological subsystems contain the energy of the earth needed for survival and the tools used to harness it; the sociological system is comprised of the social structure and governmental organization that orchastrates the technological subsystem; and the ideological subsystem is comprised of the values, beliefs, religions, etc. that justify it all. White argues that while the ideology and social structure influence the culture, it is the technological subsystem that determines it. Therefore, a pastoral culture has one form of government, an agrarian culture has another, and an industrial culture has yet another. If that is valid, then we see the devolution of our historical Jeffersonian federalism into a complex, authoritarian, centralized, multi-cultural, buteaucratic, ever-more-totalitarian statism.

H. V. Traywick, Jr. link

9/1/2025 11:37:48 pm

That is, as we evolve (devolve?) from an agrarian culture into an ever-more complex culture with the Industrial Revolution, the Atomic Revolution, the Cyber Revolution, and go spiraling off into our frenzy.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/2/2025 06:53:18 am

YES!!!! This is one of my favorite topics to talk about with other intellectuals. Love what you wrote. Is the toothpaste already out of the tube as Bob Haldeman I think said? Is it too late to go back? Is Statism the norm in a post-Industrial Revolution society? It appears so. Who owns America? Well, it ain’t us.

I think you should write a longer piece on this subject and ask Professor Wilson if you can post it here on his blog site. It’s definitely worthy of its own highlight outside of a comment section.

Can we go back? And if we can even go back somehow and bring it back in some updated format how is it even possible? Is it possible? How?

How do we best best protect our kith, kin, land, and Faith from Statism? I honestly don’t know. Because I honestly don’t know if we can go back. But how can we have enough Jeffersonianism in this post-Industrial age to just be left alone? For our descendants to be safe from harm? Care to elaborate more on a blog post that’s not in the comment section?

H. V. Traywick, Jr. link

9/2/2025 12:30:09 am

So when America draws on the "Treasury of Virtue" that Father Abraham bequethed her, and goes off on her Crusade to Make the World Safe for Democracy or We'll Bomb You Back to the Stone Age, it is an excercise that goes against the natural order. One does not impose parliamentary democracy on a Bedouin tribe of camel herders without imposing their fundamental way of life first. When that foolish effort meets with natural resistance, you end up having to bomb them back yo the stone age, which begets "terrorism," the "poor man's atomic bomb." Which begets "The (endless) Wars on Terror," and job security for the military/industrial complex, etc. etc. etc... and if anyone doesn't like it, the totalitarian State will explain it to you.

Clyde N Wilson

9/2/2025 04:56:33 am

For the record, I am not a Boomer. I was born before Pearl Harbor.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/2/2025 06:44:59 am

See comment below addressed to you in the fist half.

George Fitzhugh's Ghost

9/2/2025 06:25:15 am

It appears General Kromwell's comments were directed at me. Let me clarify, although I thought I was already clear. I am not a Nazi. I do not support National Socialism. I was simply contending that Hitler was the lesser evil when Europe was looking down the barrel of the Soviets ever expanding communist revolution in 1939. I even said that we did *NOT* have to go full Corey Mahler to take a moderate position on Hitler.
Next, I do not think George Fitzhugh considered himself a defender of a return "medieval feudalism" as he wrote in defense of the antebellum South. As to Kromwell's statement "I’ll take the heathen Jefferson any day over that option" I think it shows where he is at spiritually. A man's thoughts on God affect his worldview.
I also do not deny -and have never denied- that Jefferson's political take on things was better than Hamilton's. And Hitler's was better than Lenin and Stalin's. But that does not mean I am a fanboy of either Jefferson or Hitler. My purpose in bringing Fitzhugh into the conversation was to balance Jefferson's proto-libertarian worldview with one from another Virginian who focused on a traditional social order based on hierarchical social structures, race, and the soil.
My reference to Clyde Wilson as a Boomer was in regards to his general take on race, WWII history, and the JQ being what is generally typical of that generation.
As to Wilson response that "Noone can be Southern and a Nazi at the same time" I would wonder this: does ideology determine whether one is Southerner? I thought that Southerners, the White folk of Dixie, were a blood and soil people and not an ideology based society as that of the Yankee largely was. If holding a political ideology can disqualify a man from being a Southerner -despite his ancestry, birth, and culture- than can adopting the right ideas make one a Southerner, even if they are a Yankee living in Massachusetts or a Hispanic living in L.A.?
Traywick made a good point about different peoples in different times and places needing different forms of government. Some races could never exist under Jeffersonianism without devolving into anarchy. Others could live quite well under it, until technology radically changed both their daily lives and way of living, and the geopolitical (mechanized warfare) situation.
I think this conversation is fruitless. Most people over age 30, myself included, are largely set in their ways. Abbeville types are not going to be pulled into acknowledging race (and legally defined racial hierarchy if multiple races are present) as the building block upon which any sound social order should be built, and upon which Dixie was built. Likewise, those of us who are racially conscious are not going to rejoice in social intercourse with the descendants of our ancestor's slaves as long as those Negroes embrace Jeffersonian ideology along with good food and music.
I think I am done with this conversation at this point. It is going nowhere. You all have a good day.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/3/2025 03:55:35 am

Don’t be silly. I meant Jefferson’s view of federalism. Clearly, I did not mean I would turn my back on my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. John 14:6. Don’t do red herring nonsense.

On the more meaty issue, yes, Fitzugh favored a return to medieval feudalism over the Enlightenment. If there’s other issues I need to address when I’m not driving to work I’ll write more later.

But don’t question my devotion and worship of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Non-believers will spend eternity in Hell, and unless they are the SPLC or ADL, my heart mourns for them. I know I write very gruff now, but you knew full well what I meant.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/3/2025 04:03:31 am

Correction. And Jefferson’s view of republicanism. Not just federalism. Republicanism isn’t just about the nature of government. Question my devotion to my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ again and I’ll go full Oliver Cromwell in Ireland.

If you read the blog site here, Professor Wilson does address our idolatry with Israel. He may not address more J questions. However, his point still stands. Our ancestors were not Nazis. White supremacy in the South is not Nazism. Nazism is an anathema to our people.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/3/2025 12:11:52 pm

Please don’t go anywhere. Now that I’ve had time to read what yo write, I agree with some of what yo say. You are very articulate in your response. Whereas, I am just very gruff now.

I guess I am a half-way type of person on this issue. I do believe the South is a blood and soil issue. And I do think the civic nationalists are wrong about the South. I personally think people like Dr. Wilson are struggling with their civic nationalist understanding of what it means to be a Southerner and the reality that race matters, and that st the end of the day, there is no true Southerner without the White man.

I’m sorry for not being more clear in my writing and perhaps being too combative with you. I understand what you mean. I probably agree with you more than Dr. Wilson.

So how do we more forward as Southerners? How do we remain race conscious, yet be Christ-centered? How do we remain race conscious, and stay clear of Nazism, especially when our enemies our pushing us into genocide?

I fear the future. I fear for my kids. Our enemies practicing genocide on is are pushing us into a corner to respond in survival ways.

I don’t like to be on the fence. But, I truly can see both points of view here. There can be no South without the White man, but there is more to be a Southerner than our race.

You have laid out your thoughts very intellectually. I may not agree with them all. I don’t agree with Dr. Wilson 100%. If I was too combative, then I am truly sorry. Sincerely. I talk too gruff now. Sometimes it’s good. Sometimes it’s not. You’ve bright a lot of good discussion to the table.

You’ve made it clear you are a not a Nazi. Our enemies accept their racial identity. Why is it wrong for us to do the same? But, like Dr. Wilson, I truly fear as our enemies continue their genocide upon us that too many on our side will embrace Nazism. I don’t want that to happen. But neither am I Nazi for saying that the White man should be in charge of America or the South.

Please come back to the conversation. You’ve added a lot to it. I would hate to think you left because of my refusal to be too intellectual ran you off. You have given a lot of good stuff stuff to chew upon. Please come back.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/4/2025 06:21:16 am

So what solutions do you offer? The civic nationalists have failed us. Clearly, you can’t be a Southerner without being White. Yes, there are Black Southerners, but there is no South without the White Southerner. But there is more to being a Southerner than being White. I have more in common with a traditional, Mexican Catholic than a White woke libtard.

But where have the racialists gotten us? It’s Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew ad nauseam. What do race awakened Southerners or Whites provide us? Do for us? How many normies do you win over with the J question. I have no ill will towards Jewish people. It is they who overwhelmingly enact and promote my genocide. I wish them the best. They have a homeland. I support Jews controlling the Holy Land-without my blood or money of course. And if they persecute Christians I think it’s the job of mercenaries to go there and fight them and set things right. But not with my blood or money. Helping Israel doesn’t bless the South. Contrary to what most of my church members think.

So, I’m asking you, what does the Alt-Right offer the Southerner that people like Professor Wilson or Donald Trump don’t? I’m being sincere. Professor Wilson’s criticisms of the Alt-Right are fair. But so are your criticisms of Professor Wilson. What did the Sons of Confederacy defend? Nothing. I wish Dr. Wilson would let me post my interaction with the head of the SCV concerning the Silent Sam statue and the ‘Slave’ monument nearby. What do say Dr. Wilson? Can I write you an article what the head of the Chapel Hill SCV said to me during an event there? A five sentence commentary here is not going to do it justice. I’ll even take a break of my retirement from anti-intellectualism to make my words sounds pithy and pretty and not so gruff.

To hell with the SCV. Look what happened on their watch.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/2/2025 06:43:14 am

Lol, I know you are not a boomer. You were born 10 years after my namesake. I was indulging him. The word “boomer” isn’t even intellectually applicable to you even if you were born after 1945.

I’m a little rough around the edges now. And it shows in my writing. I don’t fully explain myself. I love the scene from Josey Wales: “Don’t piss down my neck and tell me it’s raining.” I’m tired of the multicultural ungodly, Yankee piss down my neck. And my writing shows it. I’m tired of the Yankee Empire. I always ask those around me: What would George Washington do? What would Robert E. Lee do? I think we all know the answer. There’s no need to go around doing IRA hits. We all know what our ancestors would do. We should embrace it and be proud of it. The more we wait, the deadlier the consequences. Deo Vindice.

Clyde N Wilson

9/2/2025 08:28:12 am

George Fitzhugh was a very untypical Southerner. His standpoint was eccentric to the body of Southern thinking. Did you know he went to work for the Freedman's Bureau after the war?
I dislike the Yankee Empire as much as anyone. We need to think on the best way to deal with it. I think the Alt-Right approach is not helpful but counter- productive...

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/2/2025 11:48:37 am

The League of the South uniting with Nazis was a travesty. But what’s the alternative? Our enemies have wicked and disgusting plans for us. They seek our genocide. And are doing well doing it. They seek our physical and sexual enslavement. One group of people will not stop seeking our annihilation. Trump loves them. I despise Nazism.

But we can’t escape the racial aspects of our history and our being. Somebody has to be in charge. And race is one of the factors in deciding that issue. If not the Alt-Right, then what? The Sons of Confederate way? Look what was lost on their watch.

I’m going to say the quiet part out loud. Without Hampton’s Red Shirts there is no Southern Redemption. What is needed now is Red Shirts. But not of the Nazi type. Demographics have destroyed us. There is no other alternative. But can such a group of men be found? Trusted? In a digital age, where we are spied on everywhere we go?

What the South needs now is a Martin Gary. And a hero like Hampton. Look around. They can’t be found. So what do we do?

Robert M. Peters

9/3/2025 09:00:49 am

What do we do? Well, we do not embrace communism, fascism, Naziism or liberalism or the centralized Hobbesian state which rules over us today. The Russian write Alexander Dugin has rejected those three. He speaks of the fourth way. We have to find our own "four way." We must nurture the virtues, passing them to the next generations. We cannot look for allies among the demons.

Robert M. Peters link

9/3/2025 08:54:51 am

Nationalism and patriotism are not the same; in fact, they are antithetical. Nationalism is an abstraction which, like all abstractions, is an ideology. Patriotism, rightly understood, the the love of the particulars of one's own people and their heritage, warts and all. When Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov wore is CCCP t-shirt when arriving at the summit between Putin and Trump, the Western media speculated, wrongly, that he was glorifying the Soviet Union. He laughed and said that the Soviet Union was part of Russian history, and, therefore, part of his patrimony for good or for bad. The German writer Goethe warned of a united Germany, i.e. a German national state which France had become. Bismarck, like Garibaldi in Italy ultimately quested for a German national state against Goethe's sage advice, not because Bismarck was a nationalist, quite the contrary, but because he saw the German petty states as too weak to counter France, Great Britain and Russia. Bismarck loved the Prussian state and knew that German nationalism, over time, would mean the end of Prussia. It should be noted that Bismarck's lineage was Slavic, i.e. part of his heritage. Yet, Bismarck set in motion a trajectory which would end with Hitler. (Note that Lincoln destroyed two unions of constitutionally federated republics: that of the United States of America and that of the Confederate States of America and replaced them with an abstract corporation with a monopoly on coercion, with the ability to define the limits of its own power and with a will animated by ideologies. The consolidated and centralized state with its fiat currency is what communism, Naziism and liberalism need in ordered to prevail as ideologies. Nationalism is itself the stalking horse for globalism for particularism, regionalism and true patrimony. A centralized Hobbesian state, whether it is run by communists, Nazis or liberals is not an option for a Southerner who is rooted in the particulars of his patrimony. This is a very complex topic with many rabbit trails. I look forward to engaging in it. For the record, I speak fluent German and am well versed in the period of the Weimar Republic, the Third Reich and the nascent beginnings of the Cold War. Sifting through the propaganda is quite difficult.

Robert Peters

9/4/2025 07:44:28 am

The South of our patrimony, the South embedded in our very bones, no longer has a cultural, social or economic context in which to live and to thrive. We must, therefore, individually and in communion in such places as the Abbeville Institute or the Fleming Foundation nurture virtues which exemplify the South of our patrimony until there is a time and place for those seeds of virtue to sprout again, likely not in our lifetimes, however. Conjuring up Wade Hampton, the nationalism, etc., is counter productive, even destructive to those ends.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/4/2025 12:19:25 pm

Sadly, I agree with 99% of what you wrote. Sadly. Unfortunately. So what are we? Now? We aren’t Americans. And we may be Southerners but most Southerners are not LOS or Abbeville types. And those are ones whose families have been here since 1600-1700s. Now with all the Yankees fleeing Blue States, what it means to be Southerner is pretty much dead.

So what are we? And where do we live? I’m not an American. But are we not more American than Southern now? Hasn’t 160 years of Reconstruction destroyed the Southern in us. So what are we? And what do we call ourselves? Look what happened to the descendants of Southerners in South America. I could write a whole sociological blog post on that disaster. For all practical purposes, the Southerner in South America is dead.

Is not the Southerner in the South now dead? Never to return? Now we are more White than Southern. God forbid, no!

Regarding conjuring up Wade Hampton, I’m being generous. Were I an Irish Catholic in the 1970’s I’d advise IRA hits on political and military invaders. Hampton is IRA light. He’s Skim Milk. And I adore Wade Hampton. But he wasn’t going around ordering IRA hits. His bravery and character is impeccable. In war and out of war. But unlike Ireland, we can’t go the Lo n haul against racial replacement. The IRA freed their country. If that’s a hard pill to swallow-I’m sorry. And Hampton freed the South in 1876. With different methods. And different variables. Hampton is a hero in The War and after The War. And so is Martin Gary.

So let me put it another way: what would George Washington do? What would Robert E. Lee do? What would Forrest do? What would Hampton do? What would Jackson do? If we search our hearts, I think we all know the answer. The Yankee Empire crossed the Rubicon a long time ago. We are being beyond generous and fair in not raising the Black Flag.

Perhaps it’s time to admit the South is dead. Sadly. And it will never come back. And soon we will be like the confederados in South America. Bred and persecuted out of existence.

For all their talk about freedom, Southern White men would rather watch Negro football and die for Israel. And let Chuck Me Schumer boss them around. And let the Gestapo Alphabet People police them. Our enemies want our genocide. They want our sexual enslavement. They are saying it loud. They are doing the genocide part quite well. They will keep a few of us around as pets for their sexual perversions.

I honestly don’t know what to do either. Uniting with Nazis is horrible. We are not Nazis. But we ain’t cucks like Sons of Confederate Veterans either. Or Southern Baptists apologizing for being White.

What’s not dead is Southern freedom. And as Armistead said at Gettysburg: Give them the cold steel. Deo Vindice. Long live men like Wade Hampton. On the field, off the field, and his great Christian character. Not since the likes of Richard the Lionheart had a warrior on horseback been such a powerful and brave force. We shall not see his likes again.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/4/2025 12:31:30 pm

Apologies to Nathan Bedford Forrest. He is of equal stature to Hampton. On and off the field and his Christian character.

Robert Peters

9/5/2025 04:57:37 am

I am a member of the SCV which certainly has its shortcomings; however, what is it about the SCV that leads you to the label of "cucks"? I am also a Southern Baptist, and I agree with you about their apologizing for being white. Were we to "unite" with the Nazis, we would become the very antithesis of ourselves. Tolkien, in his Lord of the Rings, points out, time and again, that the temptation to use Sauron's ring, the one which binds them all, against Sauron is in fact playing right into Sauron's hands. No, we must nurture the virtues which identify us as Southerners until Providence brings forth a day in which those virtues can flourish again. He who endures to the end shall be saved.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/5/2025 12:55:41 pm

Hey Dr. Peters, you offer me a fair question about the SCV. Let me get things settled at the home tonight and see if Google still has stuff up that I can provide as evidence, and I give you my word I’ll respond. My goal is to respond back to your question about the SCV tonight. I don’t want you thinking I’m dodging your fair question.

GENERAL KROMWELL link

9/5/2025 06:41:22 pm

So, I came on to talk about these cucksters from 10 years ago. And for the record, Brad from Occidental Dissent is much more articulate than I am. I am now the anti-intellectual General Kromwell-out from the grave, and ready to drive the Yankees into the James River.

I was debating to write about them with embrace of DIEversity 10 years ago. Then, I was going to talk about what the Head of the SCV in Chapel Hill, NOrth Carolina said to me at Silent Sam-which is beyond CUCK! Tomorrow, God-willing, I'll come back and write about that encounter.

But for now, I'll just quote from the head of the SCV just a few years ago: Asked if he thinks it’s racist to be part of the group, McCluney was emphatic. “No no no,” he said. “In fact, our organization is very diverse. We have people of various colors. We have people of various backgrounds [and] religions that are members of our organization.”

What a cuck response. Do I need to even elaborate???? "VERY DIVERSE?" Yet, look at their national meetings-100% White. But, look: we aren't rayciss. We have Black friends. See?

I'm being generous in my response here, because I am rushed. My kids want me to play with them. Look what they lost on their watch. All while saying: "WE ARE VERY DIVERSE." Look at what the SCV cuck did to the Museum of the Confederacy and the White House of the Confederacy.

The Southern soldier didn't die for diversity. There is no South without the Southern White man. George Washington, even with his black soldiers, didn't die for Black equality. White supremacy does not equal Nazism. Somebody has to be in charge.

Did our heroes ever respond with cuck responses like that head/former head of the SCV? And if someone says Hampton, Hampton did have a lot of Black support. I could go back and write about example upon example of the SCV highlighting their diversity at the expense of the Southern White man, but it would be to no avail now. The Southern White man prefers being cucks to Negro football and apostate Israel.

Just like the sovereignty of God and free will of man, the racial aspects of the South meet the non-racial aspects of the South. They meet somewhere. To deny one without the other is to deny reality. Racial talk with the Abbeville types is frowned upon-but to deny it, is to deny reality. Some of us are tired of celebrating that holiday of the sexual degenerate and fraudster, Ductor Revrun Marten Loother Kang. Some of us want a free South.

The civic nationalists failed the South in the 20th century. And sadly, it might be the Nazis type who redeem the South. And even if there were anything to redeem, who wants to live with and under Nazis? Not me. This blog post by Dr. Wilson should be his swan song. The alleged Greatest Generation and their kids failed my generation and the following ones. Sadly, for some, Nazism seems like the only viable alternative-especially when the other side is gassing us into genocide with demographic replacement. You heard of Zyklon B? Well, you are experiencing "Southern ND"-standing for Southerners Now Dead....

For the record, I hate Nazis and Nazism...

Clyde N Wilson

9/5/2025 05:29:40 am

Dr. Peters, right you are. We must work for the South in positive ways. Let us celebrate the many great things about our people. The South is a living cultural reality, not an ideology..

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/5/2025 12:51:29 pm

As much as I want to agree with you and Dr. Peters, you are about to be racially replaced in your own homeland. Because if Yankees and a Jewish Cabal. Being a Southern is more than being White. And you can be Black with slave blood and be a Southerner. But there is no South or Southerner without the White Man. It would be bad enough if we were just facing White people fleeing Blue States. I don’t want them. Go back to your Yankee Hellhole. But the Yankee Immigration Act and the Jewish Cabal are committing genocide not just upon Southerners, but all White people. In America and in Europe.

You are demographically dying. Demographics is destiny. Time is not on your side. The Communists have won. America is spiraling into a colossal utopian abyss. It’ll be like an EMP attack over our skies. Your women and boys will be used as sexual slaves. You will outbred. There will be forced miscegenation. Forced sexual slavery. I beseech you all: There is no more time.

Abbeville types can distance themselves away from the League of the South, but its groups and people like the LOS that are needed to save you. And I hate that the LOS united with Nazis. But what has Dr. Hill said that is untrue? Is he even still alive?

I beseech you all. You are headed towards a horrible destruction. I’m ringing the fire bell in the night. This is not Rorke’s Drift. You will lose. You will die. You’ve already lost. So what is the solution? I beseech you all. There is very little time left.

H. V. Traywick, Jr. link

9/6/2025 03:35:15 am

Looks like you're right, General. "E Pluribus Unum" reminds me of the tiger chasing Little Black Sambo 'round and 'round the palm tree until they both turn into a puddle of butter.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/5/2025 01:05:20 pm

And for the record, Anti-Jewish Cabal promoting our genocide and/or Anti-apostate Israel does NOT EQUAL Nazi.

I AM NOT A NAZI!!!

Joseph Johnson

9/6/2025 07:28:19 am

Message to alt-right maniacs: Everything is not a Jewish conspiracy, everyone is not a Zionist and Hitlerism/Nazism is not an answer to our Civilizational Debacle.

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/6/2025 03:29:08 pm

I hope you are not referring to me. A Jewish Cabal committing genocide upon our people is not a crazy conspiracy theory. Remember the SPLC, when they got caught on camera with Great Replacement evidence a few years ago? On camera? That's just one example. If you were referring to me, then you sound dumb and part of the problem. The evidence is on my side. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, then you should be ashamed of yourself. And you come off cuck not knowing about it.

I am very hesitant to cite evidence of the Jewish cabal promoting racial and ethnic genocide upon White and even Asian (Japan) nations out of respect for Dr. Wilson and this blog site. I don't like talking about the J Question. But it seems relevant with Dr. Wilson's blog post here. And if you are ignorant of what they are doing and brush it off as thoughts of a "maniac," then you sir a Cuck of the greatest degree.

Go down the Jewish Cabal Rabbit Hole. Start with the SPLC on camera promoting the Great Replacement. I'm not going to do all your homework for you. What do you think George Washington would have done if he had found an organization within his borders promoting his genocide???? Ask yourself that question!!!

I'll say it again: What do you think George Washington would have done if he had found an organization within his borders promoting his genocide???? Ask yourself that question!!!

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/6/2025 03:31:05 pm

Were you wrong assuming I am a Nazi because I point out a Jewish cabal promoting our genocide??? Surely you would not say something so dumb when: 1) I am not a Nazi. 2) The evidence is on my side...

I hope you are not referring to me. A Jewish Cabal committing genocide upon our people is not a crazy conspiracy theory. Remember the SPLC, when they got caught on camera with Great Replacement evidence a few years ago? On camera? That's just one example. If you were referring to me, then you sound dumb and part of the problem. The evidence is on my side. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, then you should be ashamed of yourself. And you come off cuck not knowing about it.

I am very hesitant to cite evidence of the Jewish cabal promoting racial and ethnic genocide upon White and even Asian (Japan) nations out of respect for Dr. Wilson and this blog site. I don't like talking about the J Question. But it seems relevant with Dr. Wilson's blog post here. And if you are ignorant of what they are doing and brush it off as thoughts of a "maniac," then you sir a Cuck of the greatest degree.

Go down the Jewish Cabal Rabbit Hole. Start with the SPLC on camera promoting the Great Replacement. I'm not going to do all your homework for you. What do you think George Washington would have done if he had found an organization within his borders promoting his genocide???? Ask yourself that question!!!

I'll say it again: What do you think George Washington would have done if he had found an organization within his borders promoting his genocide???? Ask yourself that question!!!

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/6/2025 03:40:27 pm

So, let me call upon Dr. Wilson himself...Perhaps you esteemed Sir would like to address the SPLC caught on camera with evidence promoting our genocide? You aren't dumb. You know the video I am talking about. Would you like to come to my defense so I don't appear as a Nazi to people who don't want to do their homework???

I don't post all the evidence on this topic for two reasons. 1) Out of respect for Dr. Wilson and this site. 2) I am not obsessed with the J Question...However, it seems relevant with what Dr. Wilson posted here.

Some of y'all can put your heads in the sand like an ostrich but it doesn't change the facts. Telling the apostate Jewish State and the Jewish cabal in or out of America promoting our genocide to F- Off doesn't make one a Nazi.

Calling out the apostate Israel and a Jewish cabal promoting our genocide does not equal Nazism or make one a Nazi. I don't know how many times I can state these facts. I feel like I am talking to woke White libtards, except on my side....

GENERAL KROMWELL

9/7/2025 08:40:05 am

I'll say it again: What do you think George Washington would have done if he had found an organization within his borders promoting his genocide???? Ask yourself that question!!!

What do you think George Washington would have done had American become what it is now? Or what Britain is now? Ask yourself. We all know the answer. And the answer isn’t John Wilkes Booth or that nut Dylan Roof.

Sitting on his ass is not theanswer. Hint: It involves a sword and a pistol.

Scott Terry

9/7/2025 10:07:08 am

~ All are born Yankees to the race of men, in this too, now, the country of the damned ~

A word, gents.

In my hometown of Edenton NC - the uncontested Prettiest Small Town in the South - there's a battle raging over the fate of our confederate monument. Being a good decade behind the rest of the culture, our town is catching the tail-end of the recent spate of Neo-Jacobin monument-removal virtue-signaling.

I have publicly challenged the anti-monument coalition to a duel-of-fists (with typical MMA rules); should they win, the moment goes quietly into the night. Should I win? We use town funds to build a bigger, better, monument, dedicated to the captain and crew of the heroic C.S.S. Albemarle to celebrate how one little ship, against great odds, almost changed the entire outcome of the War.

As the great William Percy says (in his Lanterns on the Levee), those Confederate monuments were ugly and abstract looking. Taking the chance to build new ones is a delight.

Building new monuments to our people is needed in both mind and marble. It's at this - the mind-monument - Abbeville has always excelled. Dr. Wilson's work, as well. I recall taking a long flight to the hell-scape of Los Angeles and only having time to grab a copy of some biography of Calhoun. It was written by a German liberal and I knew I was in for it, but miracle of miracles - Dr. Wilson had managed to swoop in and write a lengthy introduction. He salvaged the entire work for me. Pushing the academic antithesis is highly valuable so I thank God for Dr. Wilson's work and career.

Anyone who thinks we can build some German political machine to churn out our salvation needs to check themselves. The C.S.S. Albemarle was built in a corn-field and so too ought any lasting political entity.

Dispense with the "isms" for your lives.

Pecos Bill

9/8/2025 02:56:07 pm

Over the years I’ve followed a number of pundits and conservative commentators and writers only to drop them completely or shelve them as entertainers who from time to time hit the bullseye. One such was the late Rush Limbaugh, who, for all his valued and accurate editorializing, proved himself totally misplaced on critical historical events. One such was his admiration and defense of Abe Lincoln and, another was his glorifying WWII and the firebombing of German cities to “stamp out evil”. I dropped Rush as a serious commentator and now so it is with Clyde Wilson. Like Rush, and other such right wingers, so called, they ignore the elephant in the room, race.

The southern flags and statues represent a white ethnic culture always calling the shots in society. Black perception of this is correct as the Confederacy represented white dominance until its legacy’s final end in 1964. In this, the Confederacy is in common with Hitler’s ideas of racial purity and white dominance.

Southern historians, defenders of the faith, are correct in an academic sense. In the halls of universities, their arguments justifying southern secession ring valid for preserving the principles of the spirit of 76 and the amended constitution of 1791. Yet streets are not as handsome as the college campus. In reality whites face the race war daily especially should they have kids in school or face discrimination on the job or in career advancement.

Clyde is good at fighting old wars, but academics such as he and heritage institutions fall back into the past where it is safe and no one will pay them wide attention if they not rock the boat too much. Clyde Wilson is irrelevant to todays fight. It may be heroic to stand at the summit as the last white man and wave an academic paper shouting, ‘we were right to secede’ all the while besieged by thousands of savages intent on his destruction.

Wilson’s article is childish and lacks any meaningful insight.

Article: It is true that the Allies engaged in terror bombing of civilians, but the Germans started it.

A playground argument and, anyway, not so. Churchill ordered the RAF to bomb several German cities and Hitler refused to return the favor in kind. Churchill then ordered the bombing of Berlin and again Hitler refused the bait thinking Churchill would come to his senses. The rules of war at the time held cities as ‘open’ and immune from attack. Hitler kept to this concept but retaliated when the fire bombings became intolerable.

Firebombing Hamburg, Cologne, and many others especially the destruction of the ancient city of Dresden were acts of depraved killers, not soldier. For these acts and many others of similar category, General Eisenhower, Churchill, Bomber Harris, and Rosenfelt are war criminals and should have been tried as such. Some RAF bomber crews openly wept after realizing the atrocious acts they committed on German non-combatants, such as dumping barrels of jelly gas on cities of no strategic value.

Bombing civilian cities illustrated the total incompetence of American and British high command. In the beginning, air commanders sent bomber after war targets but these were so defended the loses could not be sustained. The raid on the Schweinfurt ball bearing plant netted a lose of some fifty B-17s with another fifty or so being scrapped as unrepairable, all from a total force of some 300 bombers. The raid on Romania's oil fields at Ploiești which failed with a large lose of the bomber force and airmen. So, burning civilians in their cities to disrupt the German workforce became the go-to plan.

Article: But thinking he could conquer Russia in a few weeks–one of the stupidest delusions in the history of the world.

Too bad Hitler didn’t have a military genius like you, Clyde, available for advice. Don’t know where this thought came from. Hitler knew the eastern front would be tough going and he realized the vast resources and manpower the Soviets had to draw upon. Hitler became concerned when he saw the massive Soviet build up (160 divisions) along the border pointing to the Romanian oil fields on which Germany was nearly totally dependent. Not comforting were the intercept messages of Soviet troops boasting about being in Berlin by the end of the summer.

As it was, the wehrmarcht pushed to the gates of Moscow. Without the aid of the odious FDR, who knows the Soviets may have signed a deal.

By the way, it was Hitler’s plan on the western front that quick ended that threat. He overruled his generals, many of whom wanted to repeat WWI.

It’s ironic that history plays such tricks. Without Hitler and General Franco, the Soviet style gulag would have likely rolled to the English Channel and beyond.

Article: And hiding in a bunker and escaping the consequences of his actions as his country collapsed. Some patriot! We cannot imagine

Pecos Bill

9/8/2025 03:14:40 pm

(Post got chopped short. Here's the rest.)

And hiding in a bunker and escaping the consequences of his actions as his country collapsed. Some patriot! We cannot imagine such behaviour by Churchill or DeGaule.

What a cheap shot garbage statement. Guess you are not astute enough to discern that the Führerbunker was in the heart of Berlin and surrounded by the enemy offering limited opportunities to escape. So, Hitler stayed with his army and what was left of his government until the last. The speech by Churchill claiming “men will say, this was their finest hour” was delivered by a voice actor not the old evil sot Winston who spent most of the war in a country estate while London burned. Churchill, DeGaule, Ike, and others made sure they avoided any possibility of getting shot at. DeGaule spent the war mostly in London running and exile government. He returned to Paris only after the Germans departed.

Hitler spent four years on the western front in WWI, was wounded once and gassed by a British mustard barrage. After recovery he returned to the front. He was awarded the highest metals for heroic actions possible for his rank and refused a promotion because he didn’t want to leave his comrades.

FDR strengthened the communist Soviets to the point they continued their world aggression. Due to FDR’s actions, they were on the march everywhere they saw weakness. So, Korea and Vietnam wars by Americans were fought because of FDR’s friendship and coziness with Stalin. Only nukes and a huge American buildup in West Germany held the monster in check until it collapsed after Reagan gave it a shove.

As an aside, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima may have been in part or wholly of German origin. Little Boy was a rail gun uranium device never tested by Americans, but dropped anyway. Odd. The tested bomb exploded in NM was a plutonium implosion device. Why not drop a bomb known to work instead of one never tested? (by Americans).

Hitlers war he fought for the white man and his civilization. In 1943 Hitler stated in a speech:
“Should we lose this war, western civilization will die within a hundred years.”

Looks like old Adolf was on to something. Stalingrad represents the high-water mark of the white west. After that defeat, the west has declined slowly into a multi-cult, egalitarian mess.

Yes Heir Hitler was a dictator and not readily disposed of. Hitler didn’t believe in democracy saying such a scheme always selects the incompetent and the clown. In a democracy no one can be held accountable as responsibility is neutralized via a large group.

In America Lincoln became a tyrant and FDR a dictator. Unfortunately, the “the greatest -naïve- generation” elected the old fool four times as their dictator. Only a dictator could raise an unwilling army of draftees to send to Normandy for….what? About eighty five percent of those US troops who hit the beaches D-Day were draftees. I often wonder what went through the minds of these young men when the ramps lowered and the shooting started. Perhaps only a few months prior they were dancing with their sweethearts on prom night and now faced their counterparts of similar age (Waffen SS) fresh from years of fighting Ivan on the eastern front. These young Americans must have had the thought: “Tell me again why I should hate and kill the German?”

White survival on the North American continent is in doubt as white population has dropped to about fifty eight percent. The once proud American cities are now ghettos of ruin unsafe for whites who quickly fall to black crime if precautions are not observed. Over the years I’ve occasionally heard someone say, “it’ll take a Hitler to straighten out this mess.”

Below as noted by John F. Kennedy.

After visiting these places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.

Paul Yarbrough

9/8/2025 03:33:51 pm

“The southern flags and statues represent a white ethnic culture always calling the shots in society. Black perception of this is correct as the Confederacy represented white dominance until its legacy’s final end in 1964. In this, the Confederacy is in common with Hitler’s ideas of racial purity and white dominance.”

The white ethnic culture called the shots AT THE TIME because they (at that time the qualified voters in the intended “republic”) were the best decision makers. After the war and up until 1964 (as you have decided) the friction came and went as a result of the original planted seeds of the monstrous so-called Reconstruction. The horrible concept of “a right to vote” and its kissing cousin “one man one vote” have driven the contemporary and monstrous Reconstruction II.

“Hitler became concerned when he saw the massive Soviet build up (160 divisions) along the border pointing to the Romanian oil fields on which Germany was nearly totally dependent. Not comforting were the intercept messages of Soviet troops boasting about being in Berlin by the end of the summer.”

This was largely (probably completely) a feint. The 160 divisions were mostly from manpower. They were almost certainly a defensive structure (mostly warm bodies without ammo and supply) What Hitler did not realize (and his generals did) was what Napoleon did not realize: outrunning your supply lines AND conducting a two front war had disaster written all over it

Bill Hill

9/8/2025 10:55:53 pm

I remember the way Dr Wilson was treated in the comments that day. It surprised me but didn’t surprise me. I don’t know how anyone could love his race (including very distant ancestors) and attack a prior generation as the root of all their problems, unless of course they desperately need a scapegoat due to their lack of courage to take responsibility for the future. I don’t think there is any need to state anything further about that site except to say they were at least pushing a narrative and sharing some ideas, which is an inherently inefficient and messy process.

I think we are in an existential struggle with mass slaughter and mass rape being a very credible threat within a couple generations if we don’t turn things around. Perhaps within our own lifetimes for all I know. The history of humans is stained tooth and claw in contest for territory and females, just like every other animal species on this planet. The only exception being that humans also fight for power and for isms, which is nothing less than a war of religion (eg Abolitionism).

My family has lived in NC since it was a colony, with at least a couple ancestors moving down from the VA colony. I also happen to have a famous and very Southern surname. I think I have pretty decent Dixie credentials except that I am not published outside a few blog posts and social media. Some of my posts and comments have been remarkably influential if I do say so myself. Too bad non of it has ever been desirable influence. So far all I have accomplished is gaining enemies among people who were supposed to be my compatriots. I have to use a pen name to protect me from my friends. I’ve been accused of everything but being a Jewish infiltrator.

Speaking of Jews I have no real strong feelings about them. I certainly don’t count them as White, even if they are classified as Caucasians, just like Arabs. I have a pretty simple cutoff: nonEuropean= nonWhite. I haven’t bothered with where to draw the line between European vs Asian yet. As I said, I have no strong feelings about Jews; they are simply behaving as a racial group is supposed to behave. It is Whites who have been behaving abnormally.

I also don’t simply group all Whites together as a single race. There are many White races just as there are many African/Black races. If you don’t believe it, ask some Africans.

I am still having a hard time identifying as a Southerner though, since according to Southern Nationalists and many others who identify as Southerners, being Southern seems to be based on just about everything except race. Somehow it’s always based on some vague belief, cultural nuance or way of life that just can’t quite be pinned down clearly. I have on multiple occasions been informed that some outsider is “a better Southerner than I’ll ever be”. I have even been informed that I am not Southern at all! I find it amazing that my racial lineage from Carolina/Virginia stock is the one thing that does not define my Southernness. Especially since my race and my sex are just about the only two things about myself that I can never change.

I’m going to just keep identifying as Dixian. It’s very easy for me to explain what Dixians are. We are the ethno-racial group descended from the British (including Ulster Scot) settlers who populated Dixieland prior to 1860. We are the people who made Dixie Dixie and Dixie cannot remain Dixie without us. It’s as simple as that and without the need to use the US as a frame of reference (a very strange habit of people who want to secede when they can’t even secede in their own minds.)

Until we are well established as our own ethnostate, I see no reason to pick any isms for my identity. I am simply a Dixian patriot, meaning I am loyal to my own race. Everything important about our culture, including economic and political systems is just a manifestation of our racial phenotype. And I just don’t feel like wasting my life trying to build on one false foundation after another.

Scott Terry

9/9/2025 05:01:24 am

Bill, I appreciate your comment here, especially as a fellow Carolinian.

I think there's something missing, though - something Dr. Wilson supplements although his contribution here is often overlooked: in Defending Dixie, Dr. Wilson talks about the "mytho-poetic" of a people.

Without this addendum in our tool-kit, discussions of "identity" are rife with ambiguity and arbitrariness. That frothing-at-the-mouth Jacobin radical Tim Wise takes pains to note how arbitrary racial categories can be, when thought of in merely genetic terms. He uses the illustration of a sporting event where people group themselves (according to the hypothetical) in light of what color shirt they're wearing in the stadium. Similarly, all left-handed people could arbitrarily group up and claim it's their genetic similarity (if left-handedness can be blamed on genetics) that give them a solid, scientific ground for their group. Wise is right to think this is arbitrary.

I have my own wild thought experiment for this: imagine, in the very near future, geneticists have so mastered the human genome as to create pills when, if taken, would transform a typical Shamika into a lovely, blonde-haired, blue-eyed Bonny-Lou overnight. Would she then be a white women? For most whom I've surveyed with this, the intuition is a strong no. Something more is needed than mere phenotypical presentation or even statistically-relevant gene sequences. It's a shared story - a shared history - a shared folk narrative. A "mytho-poetic."

The story we tell about ourselves is most important and, while hard to scientifically qualify or survey, is very easy to see at a distance. You know walking into the gas-station every morning if that fella over there is "one of us" or if he's spun off into a modern mytho-poetic. You can tell at a glance, by the way he dresses and carries himself. Women make it very easy; they practically shout their mytho-poetic by the costume they choose to wear.

I may be overly-influenced by the libertarian wing of the Paleo-con movement but I'm convinced that if this mytho-poetic is strong enough, we don't need our own political entity at all (you mention the jews in a related light - they existed quite well in a disaporia and still do today, even after the artificial invention of the Israeli state). It's the poets and historians and literary giants who clarify and amplify our people's mytho-poetic. It's our older generations who are the roots, connecting us to the genuine and living life-blood of our past.

The Alt-Right crowd have been severed from their roots and are trying to analytically re-grow themselves into an abstracted caricature of Southerners, as visualized through the Hollywood lens of Clint Eastwoood movies, pagan strongmen, and the toilet humor of anonymous shock-jock content-creators. They need to be re-grafted to their roots.

Bill Hill

9/9/2025 03:34:49 pm

Dear fellow Cackilackian,

I recognize your name from conversations at another time and place. This is the first time I have seen the term mytho-poetic, but I take it to refer to the collective soul of a group, in this case our own race would be that group. Working on the mythology-poetic, if I understand the concept correctly, is indeed important as many people will be moved by nothing else. It certainly contributes to our ability to enjoy being who we are and can serve as a fast and frugal way for us to identify one another. Fast and frugal but certainly not very reliable. What if the genotype and mythopoetic type contradict each other? I say the genotype defines what he is and the mythopoetic defines whether he is a typical or even a good one or not, and if the mythopoetic is not reconciled to the genotype then he is at greatly increased risk of being a traitor, whether viscerally driven to be an anti patriot or just a simple sellout.

Tim Wise is spitting lies as usual. Race and sex are about the two least arbitrary categories imaginable. Handedness may be a close second I suppose, but in prior times when it was discouraged many who were not strongly left handed were able to convert to right handed with enough effort. And many “sort of” gays once claimed successful conversion through therapy. Lot’s of people have converted religions and political ideologies, but no one ever converts race. Why not?

In the case of Shamika, it would depend on whether the entire genome, throughout every cell in her body, including all of her eggs and her mtDNA had been edited at every location from African to Dixian gene variants. If so then my answer would be Yes, but simply changing those genes that lead to the phenotype expressions that we can most easily observe would not do the job. It would create a hybrid that looked outwardly like a Dixian. It would be like the recent claim that scientists had brought back a long extinct wolf species by editing just a few genes from a modern wolf. All they did was create a hybrid species, but it could be a big first step in bringing back the extinct species if subsequent generations are done the same way so that the extinct genome is eventually reproduced in a breeding population. I know this is more than you asked for but if the Shamika—>Bonnie-Lou pill were actually developed and implemented it would kill dear Bonnie-Lou within the first hour of existence due to her immune system rejecting all the foreign (Shamika) proteins in every cell in her body. Just like the body rejects foreign tissues when transplanted, except in this case it would be the whole body rejecting the whole body and trying to remove itself. So I’m not holding my breath for that pill to save our race.

We are a race, not a country, not a religion, not a musical genre or any other cultural trait.

Our country is our territorial claim.
Religions come and go and evolve beyond recognition.
Our music, literature and cuisine are influenced by historical experiences but are more than anything else, a part of our phenotype.

We can only die on one hill and it must be race. It is the foundation of all else. Only a fool would try to build a house first, then lay the foundation last, or be careful to get everything else perfect but compromise the foundation.

Dr. Clyde N. Wilson

Hitler's New Fans

Leave a Reply.

Author

Archives