|
One slogan I have often encountered on pro-South social media groups and see on T-shirts, bumper stickers, and more is “Heritage not Hate.” If I understand correctly, they are stating that the reason for their display of affection for the Old South, the Confederate soldiers, and their history is that it is part of their family, their bloodlines; in other words, they are honoring the South as a people due to kinship ties. In that case, I fully understand; that is admirable. But does this not imply that the South also stands for hate? Generally synonymous with racism.
This pro-South slogan is defensive. It allows the critic to frame what the South stood for: racism or hate. And it places these modern-day Confederate admirers and descendants as having to make an excuse for why they esteem the Confederate soldiers; not for what they stood for, but for bloodlines alone. I think the critic would rightly object, saying that not everything our ancestors have done —no matter where you are from —is worth remembering or celebrating. Further, where does it leave a Northern-born lifelong Vermonter such as myself, who is unabashedly pro-South? I side with the South not due to any heritage ties, but despite them. I stand with the South for what they stood for, and I would never accept that “hate” label in comparison to the North. It was the North that despised and eradicated other cultures, the South, the Native American, and later in wars across the world to promote “democracy.” It was the South that believed in local control, allowing various diverse groups to live and let live. The North did not want slavery expanded; this is true, but only to prevent the Southerner and his slave from living among them. The races were in harmony far more often in the South than in the North, in large part because of that same live-and-let-live attitude. In the future, perhaps Southerners could choose some new slogans. In defense of self-governance, in defense of liberty, resisting governmental tyranny, for a Christian order, for tradition, for conservatism, for limited governance, for family and local control, “man over money”, “government was made for man, not man for the government”, or even “live and let live” and many similar slogans would be more acceptable.
14 Comments
David T LeBeau
4/12/2026 07:32:44 pm
Excellent work, Isaac C. Bishop. I see that slogan exactly the way you see it. I never use it and I attempt to correct people on Pro-Southern social media platforms by saying "My heritage and your hate." Again, I agree, I'm not on board with that rallying cry. I wish I had a better response.
Reply
Earl Starbuck
4/13/2026 05:56:50 am
As a native-born Southerner, I always understood the slogan as a refutation of claims regarding the Confederate flag. In other words, the flag represents heritage, not hate. It seemed to me to be intended as a reclamation of the flag from the skinhead/neo-Nazi types who desecrated it and whom the media/court historians used to make the flag a "hate symbol" in the minds of much of the US public.
Reply
Thank you, Earl, and I think that is true for many. But I have also seen it the other way, where people have said yes, the South was wrong, racist, etc., but they are our ancestors, and that is why we honor them/the flag.
Reply
Earl Starbuck
4/14/2026 06:00:12 am
Slogans do tend to be vague. That's why historical and cultural context are vital to understanding them. It is also why slogans tend to have a short shelf-life, as the context that made them relevant is apt to change. In any case, "Heritage Not Hate" is essentially reactive, and we Southerners and friends of the South need to be more proactive in our approaches, including our slogans. That being said, I've no notion of what to replace the slogan with. 4/14/2026 10:58:14 am
Finally!
Reply
David T LeBeau
4/14/2026 08:04:58 pm
"It’s catchy, sure, but it’s also a tarbaby." I love it and it's 2 cents more than I have. Good job, P.C. Graham.
Reply
Paul Yarbrough
4/15/2026 01:23:32 pm
"... but it’s also a tarbaby."
Reply
Clyde N Wilson
4/14/2026 11:25:17 am
My comrade Paul, nobody would say you are on the sidelines. You are right in the middle of the field.
Reply
Jeff Paulk
5/12/2026 05:24:59 am
I completely agree with you. The "Heritage, Not Hate" puts us in a defensive mode. We need to be in the "attack mode". I liked the "My Heritage, Your Hate" slogan by Mr. Lebeau. It turns it around and puts the negativity on the attacker. By the war, I loved "Defending Dixie's Land" and gave it a 5 star review. You may be from the North, but you are a lot more Southern than many who were born in the South.
Reply
Jeff Paulk
5/12/2026 05:27:45 am
Sorry. Should have been "by the way".
Reply
Chris
5/12/2026 05:52:10 am
Agreed. This flag still stands for freedom, and self-determination. It needs to stand for a political path forward, as well as respecting and remembering the culture that raised it up. The hate is entirely from the leftist red-green alliance, and not those who carry on with an understanding of what the Confederacy was actually all about (hint: it wasn't slavery. No slave ship ever sailed under that flag.) We can't all have Confederate blood in our veins, but we can be Copperheads and support the truth.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJeb Smith (Pen Name Isaac C. Bishop) is an author and speaker has written over 130 articles found in several publications. He is the author of Defending Dixie's Land: What Every American Should Know About The South And The Civil War written under the pen name Isaac C. Bishop. He has been featured on various podcasts and radio interviews. For speaking engagements, interviews, or questions, please contact him at [email protected]. Archives |