RECKONIN'
  • Features
    • Clyde Wilson CLASSICS
    • Charlottesville
    • Book Bench
    • Links
    • Magnolia Muse
    • Movie Room
  • Contributors
    • Full List
    • Isaac C Bishop
    • Enoch Cade
    • Carolina Contrarian
    • CSA Appreciator
    • Walt Garlington
    • Paul C Graham
    • Peter Griffith
    • Ruth Ann Holley
    • Jessamine Lee
    • Perrin Lovett
    • Olga Sibert
    • Southern Mama
    • Southern Zoomer
    • Clyde Wilson
    • Paul Yarbrough
  • Contact
  • Features
    • Clyde Wilson CLASSICS
    • Charlottesville
    • Book Bench
    • Links
    • Magnolia Muse
    • Movie Room
  • Contributors
    • Full List
    • Isaac C Bishop
    • Enoch Cade
    • Carolina Contrarian
    • CSA Appreciator
    • Walt Garlington
    • Paul C Graham
    • Peter Griffith
    • Ruth Ann Holley
    • Jessamine Lee
    • Perrin Lovett
    • Olga Sibert
    • Southern Mama
    • Southern Zoomer
    • Clyde Wilson
    • Paul Yarbrough
  • Contact

Jessamine Lee

Collapse Is Assured

9/27/2026

1 Comment

 
Picture

Brethren, 

I wanted to write this as a sort of companion piece to what I was talking about the other day.  I touched on it a bit then, but there are three main points that I think really merit hammering home:
  1.     Collapse is assured.  We, as a society, lack the will to do what it would take at this point to arrest it, even if enough of the population were capable;
  2.     There’s no way to predict the timeline or exact fallout from this, so those of us who see it coming are best off taking care of our own, building our skills, collecting what resources we can, and teaching our children to be as formidable as possible;
  3.     And finally, not losing hope or heart no matter how hopeless it all looks.  Easier said than done, but that’s why I want to harp on it.  


There is no one more disgusted by the Public than those of us who must deal with It- with them- on a regular basis.  And brethren, let me tell you- stereotypes don’t come out of nowhere.  Just as there’s more merit to the stereotype of the overalls- clad, MAGA- hat- wearing redneck sitting gape- mouthed in front of Fox News than we like to admit, there is equal accuracy in the stereotypes that get social media accounts suspended and their operators doxxed and canceled.  


The lowest class of society are not only exempt from paying taxes, they’re subsidized by their betters.  When charity is outsourced to government- no matter what level of government it is- two things are inevitable.  One, the undeserving will always get some, if not most, of those resources; and two, it will always and inevitably be weaponized.  This is why I cannot support any government welfare; it is impossible to design a system that is immune to being gamed, that won’t snowball past sustainability, and that won’t be weaponized by the ruling class.  


And yet, it is as dangerous to say this publicly as it is to acknowledge that humans are by nature a hierarchal species.  Egalitarianism is inherently utopian.  Egalitarianism is just as much a lie as any other utopian delusion.  



I have utmost respect for the Founders, but Thomas Jefferson was wrong when he wrote tha
t all men are created equal.  We have but to look at the World IQ Map to see that.  (I will, however, concede that he could not have known that those words would take on such a life of their own, and break free of the context in which they were written.)  


I don’t have a better system to propose than the one put forth by the Founders,
but I think we can all agree at this point that the one they incepted is well and truly dead.  The Republic of the Founders died in 1865.  It pains me to admit that the leftists are correct about anything, but they are correct that the Stars & Stripes is the flag of the American Empire.  


Brethren, I don’t know about you, but the moment I had that epiphany, every scintilla of affection for the Stars & Stripes that propaganda had instilled in me
died on the spot.  I still have love and respect for the Betsy Ross flag, and for the Battle Flag, but the American Empire is such a monstrosity that not even nostalgia can redeem its flag for me.  And if you have this same sentiment but feel guilty for it, please know that there is no good reason why you should.  Indeed, you should scrutinize the motives of anyone who says differently.  


The Stars & Stripes is the flag that flew over the Union armies as they invaded Southern States that had done their best to secede peacefully.  (Yes, we’ve been taught that it was Southern soldiers at Fort Sumter who fired on U
nion forces first, but anyone who knows for sure is long dead, and history taught by the victor is suspect at best.  I am not convinced that it was the South who fired first.  Even if they did, the Yankees shouldn’t have been there in the first place- their presence was in and of itself a provocation.)  


History as taught in the publicly funded school systems should be questioned at the very least.  The primary goal of the public school system is not t
o teach its students useful information, or even to create good citizens.  The primary goal of the current American school system, no matter which school system it is, is to train its subjects in obedience to authority.  Either students will learn to submit to authority or they’ll be started down the incarceration pipeline, but either way they will be formed and trained to navigate a society in which they are not expected or allowed to exercise a degree of autonomy which could correctly be termed freedom.  


Nor will they ever.  
It will take longer than the lifetime of anyone now living to restore what was lost 161 years ago, if such a thing is even possible.  


I say collapse is assured because the critical percentage of the population that must be in agreement for true social change, or for drastic action, will never approve of the extreme measures that would be necessary to fores
tall catastrophe.  The catastrophe may not take the form of total collapse- and given how many nukes we have, I hope and pray it doesn’t- but we’re already in a steep decline, and I think everyone agrees at this point that the status quo cannot and will not hold.  


Look at welfare obligations.  Look at the national debt.  These financial burdens alone are more than can be fulfilled.  As one contributor to the most recent issue of
Islander magazine pointed out, debts that can’t be paid won’t be.  


If I ever see a penny of Social Security money- which I won’t- it will have been drastically devalued from what it was worth when it was extorted from me.  
Yet I have no doubt that I will be expected to act as the Boomers do, to be grateful to have even that much, to believe that the pittance given to me is the same money that I paid in instead of money extorted from my nieces and nephews and their peers.  


Same with Medicare.  Do you know, brethren,
that the entire healthcare industry revolves around Medicare and Medicaid policy?  That government money is what really funds the healthcare industry.  That’s why it’s so dysfunctional.  Everybody wants to gripe about how broken healthcare is- and it is completely broken, don’t get me wrong- but the reason is because government pulls the puppet strings through money.  Obamacare exacerbated the problem, but the fundamental issue was already there.  


I mention Medicaid, too, because the people who qualify for Medicaid use
medical services as disproportionally as they use every other social service.  The people on Medicaid are almost certainly also going to be on SNAP- Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, more commonly known as EBT or food stamps- and collecting whatever other forms of welfare for which they are eligible.  


That welfare, by the by, is why this segment of the population bother having children at all.  And what wretched creatures most of those poor children are!  



I know one medic who was called out for a sick child and arrived to find the mo
ther on her phone, seemingly indifferent to the suffering of her visibly sick toddler.  When he asked if she had given the child any Tylenol, the mother responded in a tone that suggested he was stupid for even asking the question, “No, that’s your job.”  


This attitude is typical of the segment of the population that utilizes these programs, especially in urban environments.  Welfare queens are n
ot a myth.  I myself, at 19 years old and making so little money as a grocery store bagger that I had 3 roommates and kept a box of emergency food in my closet, once saw a family pay for groceries including steak and lobster with EBT, and when I loaded their groceries, it was into an Escalade.  I have taken payments for wedding cakes that were paid for with EBT.  Friends of mine who worked in the Deli took payments for cold cut and sandwich platters- cold, because hot food doesn’t qualify- with EBT.  


Brethren, I was raised in a household that teetered between upper working class and
lower middle class depending on what the economy was doing and whether my dad worked any hurricanes that year, but I myself have been solidly working class my entire adult life.  I’ve gone hungry to pay bills.  I’ve had to save receipts for optional purchases until the return window passed, just to be sure I could actually afford it.  When I looked into whether I qualified for any of those programs, I didn’t.  I still don’t, and despite working in the healthcare industry, I can’t afford health insurance.  Despite making the most money I’ve ever made, I still live paycheck to paycheck.  Actually less, given that I have debt.  Debt, which is essentially impossible to avoid if you want to own land, a home, or make any purchase of a comparable scale.  You need credit to do that, and while not paying utility bills on time will tank your credit, actually paying them doesn’t build it.


The entirety of the current paradigm is designed to train and incentivize the population to be fat, lazy, stupid, and most of all complacent.  It is designed to funnel and trap all but the ruling class in perpetual debt.  



Our current system is, in a word, usury.



There is a very good reason you don’t see that word used publicly, and why the people who try to are punished so severely for it.  



Between that, and the snowballing welfare obligations and social degredation since the 1960s,
we’ve passed the point of no return.  There is no political solution.  There is no rescue coming.  The ruling class have ensured that rescue would necessarily be tyrannical, and once such means had been accepted, there would be no coming back from them.  


It’s over, in other words.  Has been for a while.  



I know it’s hard to accept.  But this is the world in which we live.  The world in which we were raised, the world we were taught to navigate, is well and truly dead. 


We are best served by seeing, and accepting, reality as it is.  



And so, brethren, I will tell you time and time again: prepare.  



Things are bad, and they will get worse.  The risin
g cost of living, the increasing pressures on farmers and individuals who own even a little bit of land- it’s bad, and it’s going to get worse.  The ruling class has no incentive to do anything but increase the pressure- slowly at first, and then faster.  


As you’ve probably noticed, they’re speeding up.  



The Boomers are dying, an
d as a group, they’re going to squeeze every last benefit from the rest of society that they can, right up to the last second.  The Millennials are weak, cringe, and contemptible as a generation.  The Zoomers are hardly better.  


There will be no rescue.  The decline will continue, and whatever resistance wasn’t killed in the womb will be killed before it can mature.  



There will be more Lindsay Clancys.  



And while there will be noble men who try to stand
against this, any success they have will be limited.  I mentioned the Bronze Age Collapse previously- Ramses III was a pharaoh during this time, and one worthy of the name.  In better times, he probably would have been one of Egypt’s great rulers; as it is, he presided over a decline.  The best he could do for his people was to blunt the worst of it for them, and keep them from fading from the historical records like many of their less fortunate contemporaries.  


We start from a much better position than those ancients.  While we are in decline, our prosperity was so much greater than theirs that even our poorest can, with proper management of resources, slowly accrue useful things to pass on to our heirs.  



So brethren, I urge you again and co
ntinually: build practical skills.  As much as you can, learn about plumbing and sanitation.  Learn about electricity.  Learn about carpentry.  Learn to sew.  Learn to cook.  Learn to grow.  Learn to hunt.  Learn to fish.  Learn CPR and first aid.  


Participate in your community where you can.  Going to church, volunteering with fire departments, p
articipating in HAM and citizen radio groups- all of these things help build relevant relationships and skills, and give you a way to start building a network of useful connections.  It also helps open up opportunities for barter with trustworthy people.  


Do these things, and teach your children to do them too.  The ruling class is going to train and incentivize your children to be as fat, lazy, stupid, and complacent as the rest of the Public if you let them.  



For the sake of your children’s future, and everything you hold dear, don’t let them!  



The current default is contemptible.  If you want strong, resilient children, you’re going to have
to make them.  And you’re going to have to instill in them an antipathy toward the current paradigm, in which victimhood is currency and weakness is incentivized in every way.  Fortitude is the single most valuable thing you can instill in your children.  


Even without a lot of money, you can start building a cache of resources for them.  Look for deals on things like solar ovens, physical media, and manual tools.  Look for physical copies of reference books for useful skills.  



Most of these will be older works.  It’s refreshing to even skim them- I got a copy of
Nutrition and Physical Degeneration a while back, and started laughing within the first couple of sentences at how completely politically incorrect it was.  The ruling classes are very good at propaganda, and shape publicly acceptable language through every means.  It’s good to expose yourself to works written prior to the current norm.  


Not least of all because things have been bad before.  Maybe not in this particular way, but freedom is constantly eroded; it is not the hi
storical norm for common people to enjoy peace and prosperity.  This is a good thing to keep in mind when you start getting demoralized- because it’s natural and inevitable to get demoralized, and disheartened, and want to stop struggling quite so much.  


The main reason people embrace tyranny is because it’s easier.  
Being a person worthy of autonomy is hard work.  (This is, incidentally, why democracy can’t work.  Normies are consensus machines and easily manipulated by default.  Even when you know this, and even when you recognize when it’s happening, it’s hard to fight the impulse.  Or instinct, I guess I should say.)  


But it’s worth it.  This is what humans are meant to do: take care of our
families and our people, build things, create beauty, and strive to leave a better legacy for our children.  


Too many people take the easy way out, and refuse to pu
t in the hard work to better themselves.  But when you do, there’s a unique satisfaction in it.  Just like there’s a timeless coziness in cradling a warm cup in your hands and appreciating the home you’ve created for yourself, there’s a sort of bone- deep rightness when you look at work produced by your own hands and find it good.


​This is what we were meant to do.  So brethren, work on relevant skills, share your blessings with the deserving, and sleep with the peace of one who is acting in accordance with God and nature.  



1 Comment

Lessons From the Bronze Age

9/12/2026

4 Comments

 
Picture


Brethren,


It’s been a while, hasn’t it?  I’m about to make up for that, so get yourselves some water and maybe some snacks.  The crazy cat lady has wandered out of the trailer park to yap at you again.  


It’s become a habit for me to put on YouTube videos while I’m doing chores, and three in particular prompted me to write you today.  



The first was commentary on how out of touch influencers have become.  I had to laugh, because it’s not just the influencers - they might be the most visibly ridiculous about it, but there’s an entire class of people out there, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, who have no idea what the real world looks like.  



The second was a video about the Bronze Age Collapse.  This was the period in antiquity in which the most advanced civilizations of the age - the Minoans, the Myceneans, the Hittites, among others - all suffered existential catastrophes, with the aforementioned ones falling completely, and others - Egypt, Assyria, Babylon- transforming themselves almost completely in order to survive.  



A third video featured an archaeologist and historian specializing in that region and time period, one Eric Cline, providing seven rules - or lessons, I would call them - that he takes away from the Bronze Age collapse.  
I’ll address those first.


So, my take on Mr. Cline’s rules for civilizations facing collapse:


1. Have multiple contingency plans in place.

This is something on which Mr. Cline and I agree.  Mr. Cline mentions resilience in the video. There’s a book, Green Wizardry by John Michael Greer, that presents efficiency and redundance as mutually exclusive. Greer also points out that Americans historically favored the latter over the former, but that’s changed (for the worse, I would argue).  I’ll get into it more later, but as someone who spent a decade working in a grocery store, I saw this prioritization of efficiency and its consequences in real time.


2. Cultivate resilience to invasion.


I agree that cultivating resistance to invasion is a good thing.  I also can’t help but notice that our rulers are doing the exact opposite of that, and have been for decades.  Arguably, more decades than anyone on this earth has been alive - Emma Lazarus wrote The New Colossus in 1883, and while the Hart-Cellar act wasn’t passed until 1965, Emanuel Cellar had been pushing for it since the 1920s. Depending on how you look at it, brethren, all of us were betrayed before we were even born.


3. Be self sufficient, but avoid alienating allies.


Agreed.  I would say this dovetails nicely with “Speak softly and carry a big stick.”


4. Be innovative and inventive.


Agreed, to a certain extent. And you don’t get there by weaponizing the chilling effect.


5. Prepare for extreme weather.


While Mr. Cline uses the opportunity to pay obeisance to the current hegemon on climate change, he also specifically mentions hurricanes.  As a daughter of the Gulf Southeast, I can confirm that you can and should, regardless of how destitute you may be, prepare however you can for a hurricane.  And since there is no part of the US in general and the South in particular that is exempt from natural disasters, every household should have a plan for those disasters which can be reasonably expected.


6. Have a secure water supply.

Here he mentions California specifically, and its disputes with its neighbors over water rights. Jokes about socialism aside, this is also something to keep in mind if you’re fortunate enough to be in the market for land and/ or a home - whence will your water come? If your local utility goes down for whatever reason, or your well runs dry, will you know what to do? Do you have the knowledge and means to purify water in the aftermath of a natural disaster?  


7. Keep the working class happy.


The ruling class are doing their best to insulate themselves from this need by utilizing technology - insert reference to Flock cameras here - but that’s nothing new.  Governments have been surveilling their populations by whatever means were available to them for as long as governments have existed.  What’s new in the modern age is the extent to which people have made themselves vulnerable to this, what with the “smart” devices and allowing exactly the rapacious hominids into office who ought to have been kept furthest from any sort of power.  



The Bronze Age collapse may be thousands of years past, but human nature has not changed fundamentally in the ages since.  If anything, our more advanced technology and higher standards of living have enabled vast swathes of the population to live in delusion, in a way that would have killed them in pretty much any other era.



The influencers that first video commentator mentioned are one such group. I doubt a single one of the twits chattering at her camera while doing makeup, or repeatedly using the word “simulation” to describe her experience in a grocery store, would be able to survive on her own merits in an age when doing so would entail actual work - or, if I may be so crude, work beyond opening her legs. (Though it may be argued that opening their lives to the Internet in the way that many, if not most, of them do is even worse.)  



And now that I’ve mentioned grocery stores, I’ll expand on what I mentioned about them earlier.  



I worked in a grocery store bakery for years.  In that time, I saw less and less actually made in the store - and the ways in which customers inquiring about the change asked about it mattered. Management could get around giving a forthright answer by saying that the product was “baked” in the store, or by answering in the affirmative when a customer asked if something was “made” in the store.  As far as management was concerned, a product was “made” in the store if it wasn’t delivered packaged and ready to be put straight on the shelf.  No, the way to get management to admit that something was shipped in pretty much already made was to ask if it had been “mixed” in-store.  In the time I was there, at least a couple of different kinds of bread went from being made entirely on-site to getting shipped in partially baked, since someone figured out that they could put in twice the amount of yeast and still get rise when the bread was baked in-store.  It was more cost effective for them to do it that way, since it freed up more time for the bakers, but they still got the benefits of customers smelling fresh baked bread and seeing personnel removing it from the oven.  Some stores even have fans that waft the scent of freshly-baked product further out of the bakery.  



Another thing I saw in my years there was more and more automation of the ordering system, and less supplies kept on hand.  This was one of many metastizations of JITT out of manufacturing.  


JITT stands for Just In Time Transportation. It refers to a system in which just enough supplies are kept on hand to last you until your next shipment of supplies. It’s a very efficient system, but not at all redundant.  If that next shipment doesn’t arrive on time, if the order isn’t right, if just one thing goes wrong, you have a problem.  And in transitioning to this system, we often did.  This was made worse by the ordering system being designed to track which supplies were being used and ordering based on what the data suggested would be needed. In theory it should have saved time, but in practice it necessitated a lot of overtime from the manager, assistant manager, and one brown-nosed baker with managerial ambitions.  



The line from management there was the same as the line from management from a hospital where I worked, whenever I asked for a shift partner because the workload wasn’t safe for just one person to be handling it:


Please bear with it for just a little longer.  I just need data to take to upper management.  I just need numbers to back up my request.


Lower and middle management weren’t seen as competent professionals running departments.  They were seen as functionaries.  



And my own manager wasn’t the only person from whom I saw this in the hospital. Doctors were treated much the same.  The hospital switched over to a new charting system while I was there; and while I never had to chart, and never saw the system myself, from what I heard doctors had to check symptoms on a checklist, and the program would suggest tests to run.  If a doctor chose not to run that test, they had to input their reason why.  



When I heard that, I was powerfully reminded of something I once read in the introduction of a book called The Coming Plague. Author Laurie Garrett wrote about her uncle, a WW2 medic and doctor, and the apprehensions of himself and his colleagues in turning over the field to successors who had never had to practice in a time before antibiotics, who had diagnostic tools at their disposal which meant that they had never had to develop the finely-tuned diagnostic sense of the elder doctors, and who had never seen polio.  



Those apprehensions were well-founded. In some ways, the Third Worlders who have seen things like smallpox or measles are better prepared for medical training than their more sheltered classmates. It’s the same problem we’ve seen in the arts: creatives who had seen war, or at least had to earn a living through hard work before their art was good enough to make them self-sufficient, made better art than "nepo-babies" who have lived in a money bubble their entire lives.  



Which brings me back to the first point I wanted to make: there’s an entire class of society that has no idea what the real world looks like. It boggled my mind to realize that there are hundreds of thousands, or more probably millions, of people just in this country who honestly believe that every single human being who exists wants to, and deserves the opportunity to, live a dignified life.  



Not all of them are able to articulate it. Not all of them realize that this is the reason they vote the way they do, why they’re so susceptible to propaganda, why their overabundance of empathy is so readily weaponized against them.  But they’re out there. They’re out there, and they vote.  



These are the people who give money to beggars, who vote for welfare, who virtue signal at any and every opportunity, and think themselves good people for it. These are the people who take SSRIs to help them quash the knowledge, deep down, that they aren’t good people and that they aren't helping. Introspection would help them more, but they find “affirming” therapists so they aren’t pushed to do any, because beneficial introspection hurts.  It hurts to look at yourself and identify the areas in which you’re wanting, in which you’re not good enough.  It’s hard to actually better yourself.  


It’s so much easier to use “self care” as an excuse to do what you want, to buy what you want, and to act in accordance with your nature.  It’s so much harder to choose to be better.  



And that’s just with the weak-willed who go along with the prevailing ideology. It’s so much worse with those who are actually mentally ill. Instead of being helped, they’re being enabled.  



I hate it when people call addiction a disease.  I refuse to. Not because this is incorrect - it does function like one.  But part of the reason medical personnel and the public are pushed by the ruling class to use the word “disease” for addiction is to lessen the stigma associated with it, and to lessen the role of personal responsibility in its management.  



Addiction is a failed coping mechanism; nothing more, nothing less. Society isn’t willing to admit that the reasons people become addicts require a lot of introspection, and a tremendous amount of willpower, to correct. It’s not as simple as giving them a lifelong prescription and calling them cured. And hardly anyone is willing to admit that no one else can do it for them. If an addict is to be anything more than an addict, they must understand why they turned to addiction, face whatever drove them to it, and commit to not using that addiction as an escape and a coping mechanism for their problems for the rest of their lives.  Because that’s yet another thing society isn’t willing to admit - an addict will forevermore be an addict. The want will always be there, and the addict has to choose every day to turn away from it.  When stressed, they might have to choose every single moment of every day to turn away from it.


I bring up addiction with mental illness because both require enablers, and society in general has been far too willing to enable those suffering with both or either for far too long.  This is what outsourcing social functions to the government has done.  


The truth is, welfare shouldn’t have any place in government.  Boomers will pitch a fit when told this - don’t speak ill of Medicare in front of a Boomer unless you want spittle flying at your face - but that doesn’t make it untrue. And even otherwise reasonable people will bend over backwards to find excuses for their pet programs when presented with the mere suggestion.



“Social Security would’ve worked if Congress hadn’t gotten their hands on it.”

“Social Security is just me getting out what I paid in.”

“If I didn’t have Medicare, I wouldn’t be able to afford any healthcare at all.”  



Social Security is a Ponzi scheme that gives those who have aged out of the workforce a pittance of what they paid in - inflation doesn’t benefit the working class. Beneficiaries aren’t getting their own money back. They’re getting what’s being paid into it now, money extorted from their heirs. Congress was always going to get their hands on it. Congressmen don’t become Congressmen because they’re principled, at least not anymore. There is no way to protect any program from being pilfered by politicians and bureaucrats. The only way to keep politicians and bureaucrats from stealing government money is to keep the government on such a shoestring budget and under such close watch that they literally can’t steal from it.  


Another thing society is unwilling to admit is that not everyone deserves charity. One reason why the homeless often spurn shelters is because shelters have rules.  A homeless addict, a lot of the time, would rather call 911 and go to a hospital than go to a shelter when the weather is too bad for them to remain on the street.  And when they get in the hospital, laws requiring staff to provide care means that those same "people" can abuse medical workers to a ridiculous degree, sometimes involving permanent injury, before anything is done about it.  


Polite society is not ready to admit that not everything human-shaped is worthy of being called human.  



The ways in which society traditionally dispensed charity - through churches and social groups - meant that there was a standard to which those seeking help had to rise (or at least to appear like they did, or were trying). Laws justifiably prohibiting government from discriminating amongst its citizens in distribution of resources to which they are entitled means that the unworthy are enabled to become resource sponges - contributing nothing, absorbing everything they can.  


Do you have any idea, brethren, how many of your tax dollars subsidize addiction? And not just narcotics or alcohol. Do you have any idea just how many medical personnel and firefighters are injured every year in treating bariatrics?  


It’s not even the eating themselves to death with which I take umbrage. It’s that someone can eat themselves to death, and maim others in the doing. Not because they’re trying to, but because moving a bariatric patient is more dangerous than anyone who hasn’t had to do it could realize.



With this, as with alcoholism, as with opiate addiction, they are enabled.  And not just in the obvious ways.  



The FDA is a joke. There’s a revolving door between Big Pharma and the FDA. Both government and the moneyed interests that own it have incentive to keep the population fat, lazy, stupid, and most of all, complacent. There’s no telling anymore what’s in your food, even if you make it yourself. Hell, even if you grow it yourself, because how are you to know exactly what is in the air and in the rain?  


Though at the very least, it’s not as damaging as what’s in the grocery store. The Amish certainly don’t have the same rate of obesity as the rest of the population. (And honestly, I’m starting to think they were right about technology in general, if not electricity in particular.) 



There are other things, too. Hormonal birth control was implemented without any long term studies (at least to my knowledge) of what using it for the duration of a woman’s reproductive years will do to her.  The horrors of unrestrained transgender ideology has shown what irresponsible use of hormones can do to the human body. So why are we so cavalier in the use of hormonal birth control? It’s become ubiquitous in general society, and that should be terrifying.  



I said all of that to say this: our rulers hate us, and they act like it.  



The most recent edition of Islander magazine asked: What is to be done? I perhaps lack the intellect to find their answer particularly coherent, but my own remains what it has been for as long as I’ve seen fit to heed the question:



Take care of your own, become as independent as you can, and do your best to make your home a beautiful refuge for you and your loved ones. Develop and refine practical skills. Read things that grow your mind, avoid brain-rot, savor simple pleasures, take joy in what you build. And when you can’t help but worry, when it feels like too much and you can’t quite banish the anxiety: pray.  



A civilization’s fall can’t be stopped by just one person, but we can each look after our own little corner of the world, and make it a better place.  When you do that, it has a ripple effect. Is it grand? No. But it doesn’t have to be.  



Being grand is overrated. It’s better to be worthy. Worthy of your name, worthy of your heritage, worthy of the blessings left to you by your forebears and given to you by God. 


Go forth, brethren, and proveyourselves worthy.
4 Comments

Not All "X" Are Like That

4/21/2024

3 Comments

 
Picture

Before I was taught better, I was prone to NAXALT- ing.

Whether or not you recognized it as such at the time, we've all seen someone do it. "Not All X Are Like That."  I'm not sure if it's a logical fallacy, or if it is, whether it has a name... but whether or not it is, and whether or not it does, if you've been on the Internet longer than 5 minutes you've seen someone do it. 

They do it - we do it- because we've been taught to.  It's no coincidence that NAXALT comes up in conversations/ arguments/ autistic internet screeching about controversial topics - especially controversial topics like crime statistics. 

And before we proceed any further, let me assure any of you who toe the normie line- I know Not All X Are Like That.  (And for the rest of you, don't bother yelling at me about who I choose to befriend.  It won't do any good; don't waste the time.)  I've befriended people of every race; I've befriended atheists and heathens and heretics; I've befriended gays and lesbians and bisexuals.  I agree with Jefferson when he wrote, "I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend."  

Like the rest of you, I love my friends.  I wouldn't call them "friend" if I didn't: coworker, acquaintance, buddy, someone I know.  There are enough other terms for various relationships that I don't use the word "friend" if I don't mean it.  

If you perceive a friend being attacked, it is natural to want to defend them.  


But what I came to realize after some (mostly) amiable mocking on Gab (back when it was more of a free speech platform than a blatant grift) was that NAXALT-ing is not actually a defense of a friend.  It is the derailment of important conversations/ arguments/ autistic internet screeching about politically inconvenient subjects and their possible root causes.  It is distraction.  It's a lowering of the bar, changing the subject to the personal.  


What it is, is something well intentioned people have been taught to do by our rulers to prevent important, good- faith discussion of various societal ills so that they may be better addressed.  Our rulers do not want these issues effectively addressed, those aforementioned societal ills being highly profitable for them. 

Discussion about a group to which your friend belongs is not a discussion of your friend in particular.  It cannot be, since the entire point is that Not All X Are Like That. It's personal to you because you know and are fond of the exception. But your friend the exception is not the one being discussed, and there's no need to drag them into it! 

Another thing I came to realize is that in order to earn my friendship, I must respect the individual. Anyone worthy of my respect is not someone I need to defend to internet "anons."  Someone I deem worthy of my friendship is well capable of defending themselves, and has the right to do so at their own discretion. Leaping to their defense in such a way can, in many contexts, infantilize them. When that NAXALT response is triggered, have you noticed that the bar is lower? Have you noticed that your threshold of "defending" your friend is lower when the amount of melanin in their skin is higher, or depending on whether or not their family lineage contains certain tiny hats?  If they are worthy of being your friend, if you respect and value them enough to call them friend, why would you not accord them the same respect and expectations you do any other friend? 

Many years ago I was walking and talking with a black friend of mine who wasn't particularly well educated.  I realized abruptly in the course of conversation that I was altering my own vocabulary; I was dumbing down my speech for her.  

Just because she's not well educated doesn't mean she's stupid. In that moment I also realized that if I were speaking to a white person with the same level of education, I wouldn't be dumbing down my speech for them.  I was disrespecting her. 

So I immediately stopped. I corrected my behavior, and in subsequent conversation, made a Napoleon joke I otherwise wouldn't have.  I wasn't really expecting her to get it, but she laughed and responded in context.  It turned out that she'd first heard the name "Napoleon" from the movie Napoleon Dynamite... but she learned more later.  

Ignorance isn't a sin, and these days, "well educated" is a term all but devoid of meaning. Are they actually well educated, or were they just able to successfully parrot back enough propaganda to placate the petty tyrants in the education system?  Love of learning and earnest intellectual curiosity have become anathema to Western education systems.  

The difference in my speech before and after my little epiphany during my conversation with my friend was not so noticeable that she picked up on it, or if she did, felt the need to comment. But the quality of our conversation, and our friendship, improved afterward.  "The soft bigotry of low expectations" is an actual thing, no matter how cringe the political philosophy of which that phrase was born.  

I mentioned in a previous piece that modern society has been disincentivized to acknowledge duty.  Time honored, traditional duty in relationships has been denigrated for decades now.  That instinct has been perverted to become the original sin of whiteness by our rulers; we are continually told that it is the duty of every white person to apologize, in every way at all times, for being white.  We are told, further, that whiteness does not just encompass skin color or other physical characteristics.  

The best lies always contain a grain of truth, and this is no exception.  It is true that the concept of "white" does not stop at skin color; whiteness can also encompass hair texture, for example, and race also is a component in matching things like bone marrow. These physical differences also influence culture- for example, hair culture between white girls and black girls is necessarily different.  Colorblindness in anything except the legal system, in equality of opportunity, was never viable.  

NAXALT is not the exercise of the duty to defend your friend.  It is programming functioning as intended. Your real duty to your friend is to be a good friend to them.  Your real duty is to not befriend people who are walking stereotypes, and to refrain from being one yourself.  

Your friends, no less than yourself, have a duty to exercise the reason given every able-minded adult by God, and to take responsibility for themselves and their own actions.  This duty is incumbent upon every able-minded adult regardless of their sex, age, race, or any other inherent characteristic.  


I had a not-quite-argument with another friend of mine recently.  She uses the word "illness" to describe addiction. She points out, quite rightly, that addiction rewires the brain itself. Being a former heroin addict (moreover, one who got addicted in her teens, before the brain is fully developed), she knows the subject intimately and feels strongly about it.  


I, too, feel strongly about it, but for different reasons.  One set of my great- grandparents died by murder-suicide - a murder-suicide preceded by years of violence.  That violence was almost certainly influenced by the fact that my great- grandfather was an alcoholic.  


An alcoholic, mind you, not a drunk.  This was a man smart enough to keep a store running during the Great Depression. In every picture I've ever seen of my grandmother when she was young, she is very well dressed. Her struggles were never ones of material deprivation.

My problem with using the word "illness" to describe addiction is that the connotations of that word undermine the personal responsibility of the addict.  My great-grandfather was inarguably addicted.  He also probably came from a long cycle of violence himself. 

But it is my conviction - not just an opinion or a belief, but an unshakeable conviction - that his alcoholism in no way excuses his actions.  Did it influence his actions?  That's pretty much a given.  But do they excuse them?  Do they lessen his culpability in the harm he caused, the ripple effects of which I can still see generations later?  No.  By no means.  

My friend saw and agreed with my points, and I with hers.  We agree that the English language does not have a word adequate to encompass the nuance of this issue.  It was an excellent conversation, the best one I've had in years.  

Had either of us resorted to NAXALT, instead of being a thought-provoking bonding experience, that conversation would have devolved into an argument mirroring the way this almost always goes on the internet.  Talking points, devolving into emotionally charged personal insults, resulting in at least one rage-quit.  


I am under no illusion that writing this will solve the problem.  I know that I'm probably not going to change anyone's mind with this.


But I do hope that maybe at least one person will read this, catch themselves about to NAXALT, and then refrain. I hope that what I have written here is a good enough introduction to the concept, and the problems with it, for someone who hates NAXALT to send this to a person they care about who NAXALTs on a regular basis; and I hope that my words can help facilitate more effective communication between those people.  I hope that I can provoke thought where it would not have been without my words.  If I succeed in that alone, even once, I will be well satisfied.  


3 Comments

Key Points

3/31/2024

2 Comments

 
Picture

By now you've all probably heard about the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, and formed your own opinions about the root cause.  

It's too early to tell whether malice or incompetence was to blame. Regardless of which it is, the lesson I'm choosing to take from this is the same:

This is a harbinger.

We all know that empires collapse slowly, then all at once.  We all know that whether it happens in our lifetime or later, the current unsustainable paradigm will come crashing down. DIE has been allowed to metastasize into applied sciences and the trades; the rot has spread too far for us to get out of this without casualties.  

Indeed, there have already been casualties.  There have been fatalities; remember the Florida International pedestrian bridge in Miami?  Or, more specifically, its collapse in March 2018?  

Probably not.  A lot has happened since then, after all.  

I had to look up the date.  I didn't remember that; what I remember about that bridge collapse wasn't the video, or the date, or the names of the dead.  What I remember about that disaster was watching the DIE pandering of every single entity involved disappear in real time.  If I remember correctly, it was a predominantly, if not entirely, female engineering team that led that project.  An Inclusive and Diverse team of females, if memory serves.

Every single entity involved, from the contractor to the university itself, was immensely proud of that... until they failed.  

Regardless of whether the Francis Scott Key Bridge was destroyed through the same flavor of incompetence as the FIU bridge, there will be more bridges that fail.  Bridges, dams, railways, airplanes, you name it.  There will be more failures, more injuries, more deaths.  It is inevitable.  

Leaving aside arguments about bread and circuses, masses and their opiates, religion and its place in schools and/ or society... setting aside all argument about the root causes, we are now at a point in which Western society consists of a victim hierarchy lorded over by the rich and powerful (a disproportionate number of whom seem to have the same taste in hats, one might notice).  In a society grown so decadent that competence is viewed with suspicion at best and those at the top are willing to burn it all down just to steal anything and everything they can get their hands on, to not acknowledge the incipient failure of the complex systems that enable and sustain the current comfortable First World existence is the height of willful ignorance.

And yet, the suburbs are full of these people.  There are hundreds of them in towns, millions of them in cities and states.  The normie earned its name by being just that: normal. Mundane. The reason we were transitioned from a republic to a democracy is because most people are easily manipulated apes, and they refuse to realize or admit it.  

This makes them all the more dangerous.

They have been bred and trained to be vacuous, perpetually comfortable, convinced of their own intelligence by dint of their ability to parrot back propaganda long enough to regurgitate it onto a test, and taught to constantly reject the concept of duty.  

The normie is the deciding factor in when all this comes to a head.  The normie is the tipping point.  Until a critical mass of normies decides they've had enough, until so many of them become so uncomfortable they can't bear it, realize that their position is completely untenable, and are able to admit that the world they thought they lived in was only ever an illusion- until then, the rest of us are just in a holding pattern.  

I've said it before and I'll say it again: we're all just waiting on the normies to wake up.

Whether they wake up, realize what's been stolen from them, and decide to take it all back; or whether they wake up, become terrified, retreat into the lies of our rulers, and resign themselves to the perpetual slavery of themselves and their progeny, remains to be seen.  But in order to take advantage of the opportunity that will present itself in that moment, friends, we have work to do.

We are the ones who build.

Even if you would not risk opposing the regime outright, every single step you take toward independence, health, and wholesome tradition is a blow to them.  Making memes, posting stickers, writing anonymous articles and/ or pamplets, and questioning narratives aloud is all well and good; but other action is needed as well, and it doesn't yet carry the same risk as does outright dissent.  

Accepting and embracing duty to your family and your community.  Refusing to cede your home to those who come to claim it.  Learning to garden, to cook, to compost, to can food.  Learning to work with your environment, rather than attempting at great effort and expense to terraform your surroundings into insipid postwar suburbia.  Learning to repair, to insulate, to repurpose, to reduce consumption.  Constantly refining skills you have and learning new ones.  Networking with people who have skills and talents you don't, and forming mutually beneficial relationships. Prioritizing genuine kindness and true compassion over vapid niceness.  Learning how and when to keep your mouth shut, whether in real life or on the Internet.  Learning how to stop an emotional reaction in its tracks and recognize when you're being manipulated.

All of these are actions that will directly benefit you and enhance your quality of life.  They are also, therefore, all acts of rebellion against the regime- because your rulers want you to lead an empty life of despair and to exploit you until you are dead.  

Reject that.  Start building.  Start preparing.  Things are going to get worse before they get better, and we may not live to see the day when the opportunity to reclaim our birthright comes.  

That doesn't matter.

What matters is that there is foundation to be laid, children to be taught, dissident libraries to be cultivated, heirloom seeds to be planted, traditions to be preserved, and homes to be built.  Families to be built. Communities to be built.  There is so much to build, brethren, so much to do.  

The world seems to be falling down around our ears.  We'll just rebuild it.  Are we not blessed, to have the opportunity to prove ourselves worthy of our heritage?- regardless of who your ancestors were, among them were warriors, settlers, and farmers.  We have advantages of which they never could have conceived.  

It's time to capitalize on that.  It's time to prove ourselves.  It's time for the hard times to make strong men.  It's time to build.

Let's get started.
2 Comments

'Tis the Season... For Grifting

12/16/2023

4 Comments

 
Picture

It's that time of year again.

Time for cold weather and cozy blankets.  Time for sparkly lights and Christmas (or "seasonal") music on the radio. And at the store, you may very well hear the incessant clamor of a bell at the door. Even if you avoid that particular beggar, the register itself will probably ask you if you'd like to donate to this or that "charitable" cause.  

These "charitable partners" of the retailer are almost inevitably corporate "nonprofits," which can be very profitable indeed for those in their upper management.  How much profit do outfits like Susan G. Komen or March of Dimes or Goodwill make compared to the rest of us encumbered by taxes?  I don't have a number to put to it, but I'd bet my pittance of a wage that it's a lot.

In the spirit of the season, I will spare you my perpetual rant about taxes, and the Fed, and how unwise it is to trust the government with anything - but especially with money.  

Instead, I would like to focus on giving (and to take every single opportunity to belittle the smug suburban NIMBY-ist, because they are among the most loathsome creatures currently infesting our society).  

These are the people who say "Oh, absolutely!" when asked to donate at the register.  The ones who give you the judgmental side-eye when you don't.  The ones who will slip the drunkard begging at the street corner $20 while waiting for the light, and then congratulate themselves the rest of the day for being such a good and generous person.  

The ones who would react with incredulous dismay to any suggestion that instead of giving money, they might've done more good to spend that $20 treating the drunk to a meal (and to be fair, there's much worse company than a street corner drunk who knows how to tell a good story.  Like, say, a suburban NIMBY-ist NPR donor who is So Very Proud of their hybrid car and monoculture lawn, which is of course kept up by a service almost inevitably staffed with a bunch of illegals who wound up in the United States thanks to the ideology and voting patterns of the aforementioned suburban NIMBY-ists).  

Most of these people have never experienced the real world.  They're from the upper or upper middle classes and grew up in nice gated communities, went to college and earned some degree qualifying them for a white collar job.  They then slept around (and called it dating), got married, bought a house in a suburb for an inordinate amount of money, had some kids that they don't make their priority by sacrificing their lives (in the mundane, day to day sense) to raise them. (Mothers who choose to work - I'm looking at you). They get divorced because they "fell out of love" with their partner, and feel hollow inside but can't figure out why because they lack any capacity for true introspection. They take a bunch of SSRIs and devote themselves to "self care" and call it a day because they're Good People.  

You know these people.  I know these people.  We all know these people because the money shielding them from the rest of us rabble in the real world is running out, and so they're beginning to be forced into dealing with the rest of us. They are beginning to learn what it's like to be hungry, to have to look at price tags and to worry about money.  They are beginning to have to learn how to live like the rest of us - those of us who grew up lower-middle or working class. If they hadn't exhausted every last iota of patience and forbearance I had for them long ago I would feel sorry for the poor wretches. It's not like they have the perspective to know what they are.  

But they did exhaust my forbearance for them, and any goodwill I otherwise might have had for them has vanished in my perpetual struggle to get along in this world they have created through enabling.

And that word - enabling - brings me neatly along to the notion of "charitable giving."  The concept is basically outsourcing.

"Here," says a Very Respectable middleman, smiling unctuously at the harried Working Mother as she's checking out at the grocery store.  "I know you're far too busy as it is, and especially with The Holidays you simply don't have the time to do Charity yourself.  Just donate to me, and I'll take care of it for you."  

This is how everything else in her life works - pay someone else to take care of it for you. That's probably what her own soul-crushing salaried job is. And so she smiles, and donates, and thinks of herself as a good person for it.  

​​​​​​​Is she, though?  Or is this paid charity just a cop-out?

When she gives the money she's giving nothing of herself.  It's not that much of a sacrifice for her, because she's used to spending money; it's the most expendable thing she has, really. She's not spending any time on it, she's put little to no thought into it, and she has no personal connection to anyone who will be helped by that money.  Looked at in a certain way, it's not dissimilar to medieval abuse of Catholic indulgences - the "charitable giver" is buying their way out of a duty, in this case the seasonal reminder of your duty to your fellow man and more particularly Your People, however you define what makes other people your own.  

Mrs. Smith pointed this out more succinctly in a Gab post, but the point is too good for me not to restate it here. Charity is supposed to be personal, most especially when undertaken as a Christian duty. Smith also astutely observed that contemporary "charity" - that is, donating money to nonprofits - ignores or circumvents the concept of the "deserving poor," and erases important distinctions between those who are in unfortunate circumstances and those who created their own misfortune.

But no matter your belief system, there's a better way than doing the corporate cop- out.

Take care of those around you!  Look after your own.

Pay attention.  Is someone around you having a hard time?  They might not be obvious about it - maybe they're quieter than usual, or you've caught them zoning out looking worried.  Sometimes all it takes is a concerned word.

Do you know how they take their coffee?  What kind of snacks they like?  Even if all you do is leave a little treat on their desk, that can be the kind of pick-me-up, the little bit of thoughtfulness, that they needed.  And honestly, isn't it better and easier for God to work through you with one small act that'll take you a minute or less, probably, than for you to just throw money at some corporate drone and call it good?  

If you think something complimentary about someone, say it.  If you have the opportunity to do something thoughtful, take it.  That's all you need to do!  You benefit as well - the joy of having done something good for someone who needed it is usually reward enough, but you're also creating a positive association with that person and establishing yourself as someone kind and trustworthy.  There have been numerous times that I was credited with doing something nice that I didn't actually do, just because I made a habit of kindness and established that reputation for myself early on.  This has benefited me immensely, and that's just in ways I can see- there are probably many more ways, subtle ways, of which I am unaware.  

But as with so many other issues, the best way to address it is by taking direct action yourself.  So, friends, go forth into the world and do good.  Be good by doing good. Do this, and regardless of where or in what circumstances you find yourself, it will almost certainly be a Merry Christmas.  ​
4 Comments

Grave Digger

11/19/2023

3 Comments

 
Picture

I dug a grave today.

It was a small one, and relatively shallow; it probably wasn't even three feet deep. But it was big enough for a cat not quite a year old.  

His name was Binx.  He was one of the prettiest kittens I've ever seen, and he grew into a beautiful, affectionate cat; black from his nose to the tip of his tail, with gorgeous green eyes.  He was pretty, and he was sweet, and so he was very, very dumb- because with cats, you only ever get two of the three.  


I'd never intended to keep him.  He was probably only eight weeks old when he wandered up to my sister's porch and refused to leave.  He'd obviously been socialized; he ran eagerly to me the first time I approached him, and the first couple of times I saw him he fell asleep in my arms.  


I never intended to keep him.  I have another cat who's ten years old, and it wasn't fair to her or to him for him to live with two old ladies.


But no one else could or would take him.  The rescue groups in my area were (and perpetually are) so inundated that they barely even return phone calls, and the city and county were fighting over whose responsibility it is to handle animal control.

To get him to a shelter, I would've had to go out of my area and beg a shelter to take him.  He was too good a cat to be wasted like that.


So I took him in.  I named him.  I paid the vet hundreds of dollars to neuter him as soon as the vet would do so, and I planned on having him terrorize me and my household for the next twenty years.  


Last night he ran out the door, panicked, and refused to come to me (possibly because the outside cats do come to me), all of which has happened before.  So as I had done before, I decided that instead of wasting hours chasing him around I'd let him stay out there long enough to get hungry and try again the next day.  


My mother found him in the road the next morning.  By the damage he took I'm guessing it was quick.  


I hope it was quick.


I'm a firm believer that no experience is wasted as long as you learn from it.  And so, as I stood in the gray drizzle this afternoon and sniffled as I hopped on a shovel and cut through tree roots and clay soil, I thought about what possible meaning there could be in God bringing me that sweet little soul, letting me love him, and then pancaking him with a friggin truck.  


At the very least, it reinforces the importance of looking both ways before you cross the road, no matter how quiet that road usually is.  


As I dug, I found myself appreciating the simple work of it.  Seeing different layers of soil.  Finding bits of clay shards in the soil- had someone tossed broken bits of a flowerpot back there at some point?  Cutting through roots.  Shaving off the sides to keep the hole in the square I had designated.  Digging a hole is more complicated than it at first seems- it requires some actual tactics, not just brute strength.


I found myself appreciating gravediggers from before the invention of backhoes.  I was only digging a hole for a cat- even for a man, even for a strong man in his prime, digging a hole six feet deep large enough to accommodate a human adult would be hard work indeed.


Hard work that feels good, feels like you're accomplishing something- because this was the last thing I could do for him.  The last thing I could give him.  Digging was its own goodbye, and it felt like a long exhale.  That alone made it worthwhile- no matter how long that little grave lasts.  (I had originally wanted to put him next to my first dog, who's also buried out there.  Though my grandfather marked her grave, there was no sign left of it.)  


But that's fine.  I had uprooted what I think is a tiny hickory tree, and I replanted it at the foot of his grave.  I planted a blackeyed susan beside the tree, knowing it probably won't survive.  I put his favorite toy, a retractable wand that at one point had a feather on the end, at the head of the grave.  I outlined the grave in some of the larger roots that I had cut up digging it.


And on the soil atop where he lay, I put an oak branch with some dead leaves.  I put blackeyed susans- pretty flowers, bright like he was- among the leaves.


All perishable, except for the wand.  All earthly things that will decay sooner rather than later, but the point isn't permanence.  The point is in the doing.


I had tea before I left to bury Binx.  There's something soothing, something reassuring, about how ancient that act really is.  Boiling water, pouring it over the tea, letting it steep.  As ancient an act as digging a hole.  


Perhaps the lesson I am meant to pick up on, and to share with you all, is a reminder and an appreciation of tradition.  Of those ancient acts; a reminder to appreciate those callbacks to ancestry.  To allow yourself to relax into tradition.

This is all the more important when the world despises you because of it.  


I took a knee today.  As shallow as it was for a grave, I still had to take a knee to lay Binx inside of it, because I wasn't willing to just drop him.


That, too, is an ancient act.  


I kneel to no one, because I have no earthly master.  By any reasonable metric, this cat was completely insignificant and his life didn't matter.  But I knelt for him.

Because he was mine, because I loved him.  Because he deserved it.  


I cried for him- I, who have watched people die in front of me and not felt a thing.

I dug a grave for him.  I knelt for him.  I marked his grave, and I made it pretty.  


​Take from that whatever lesson you will.


3 Comments

Independence Day

8/27/2023

9 Comments

 
Picture
I was working the other day, driving, and a military jet flew overhead.  

Not unusual; there are a couple of military bases in the area.  What was unusual was my reaction.

For the first time in my life, there was no joy or awe or pride. For the first time in my life, my emotional reaction was wariness; my subconscious interpreted the jet as a potential threat.  The first thought that sprang to mind was wondering about the pilot: Was it one of the military's diversity hires up there?  

Something similar happened on July 4th this year. This year, Independence Day felt farcical, felt mocking, in a way it never has before.  I felt no fellowship with the people who were celebrating with heartfelt, genuine patriotism; I looked around and saw nothing of which I could be proud.  I looked around and saw Southerners flying the Federal flag, I heard them playing hackneyed songs from hypocritical singers who sold out long ago to moneyed interests who subvert any authenticity in the art, and I realized that there is nothing in this hollowed out corpse of a once- great nation to justify pride except history out of living memory; the legacy our rulers are so eager (and desperate) to denigrate, that they want to stamp out entirely - and us with it.  

It felt so strange. I would love to be proud of my state and my nation... but I cannot, because there is nothing except dead history of which I can be proud.  My state and my nation have done nothing in my lifetime, my parents' lifetime, and arguably my grandparents' lifetime, worthy of pride.  They have only ceded ground to enemies and allowed themselves to be denigrated and used.  

​​​​​​​I suppose this sense of alienation is the price of truth.

And perhaps this is a Southern rite of passage. My parents were subjected in their own day to sneers and jeers about Southerners being losers, and the Confederate flag a symbol of disgrace that those who fly it and take pride in it are too stupid to recognize as such.  

As though these same people don't honor the American Indian or actual Indians or the Zulu or any other number of peoples on the losing side of a conflict for their valor in the struggle.  

No, it's their forced countrymen that they take such mean-spirited entertainment in denigrating.  

This has never hurt my feelings; I have no respect someone for their mocking or ill opinion to hurt, and I do not and never have particularly respected insects.  No, instead such mockery only underscores how right my ancestors were.  

Are these really my countrymen, these people who wish me ill?  These people who mock my honored dead, who sneer at my heritage, who laugh at my accent, who expect me to kneel before them and lick boot? I'm expected to feel some sort of kinship with them, kinship under the Federal flag that my ancestors died fighting? (Or rather, my ancestors' fathers and brothers- few enough of ours made it home that I'm not sure I even have any Confederate veterans in my immediate ancestry.)  

No.  No, I do not feel any particular kinship with the Yankee and his nasal accent, the Midwesterner and his odd gelatinous food, much less the West Coast hippie. The South is my home, Southerners my people, and I don't much care for anything or anyone else.

When the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 made the news as I was eating my breakfast, my reaction was a calm, "Who cares, it's just a bunch of Yankees?" It horrified my mother, but this is how humanity is wired.   Attempting to care about the entire world will drive you mad.  We are made to care about our own- expand that circle out too far, and you will exhaust yourself.  Compassion fatigue is not limited to first responders.  

We were never meant to care about the great mass of humanity, and convincing people that they were is one of the greatest disservices, one of the greatest "crimes against humanity," that has ever been perpetuated.

Yankees are not my people.  Midwesterners are not my people.  West Coasters are not my people.  The Federal flag is not my flag.  I may adopt those immigrants who themselves adopt the South, love her, and assimilate into my circle; I may choose to call worthy Yankees or Midwesterners my brothers; but at the end of the day the South is my home, and Southerners my people.  Names on tombstones in the local graveyards mean more to me now than the creatures dwelling in DC or rioting in Portland or [finally formally and openly] usurping the First Amendment in Maine.  
The older I get the more things I realize my grandparents were right about.  And so the Federal government can go hang. I will honor my ancestors by living well, and doing my best to prove worthy of the name and heritage to which I was born.

No matter where I live, I will have a garden (no matter how small or ragged), as my parents and grandparents and great grandparents did.  I will cook real food, as my mother and grandmother and great grandmothers did.  I will strive to be thrifty, as they were; now that I have finally found my style, I will dress as well as my grandmothers did; I will keep a robust sense of humor like my great grandfather, and I will be as bullheaded and irascible as any of them when I see fit, and without their alcoholism to grease those gears.  

I'm done calling myself an American.  I'm a Southerner, and dammit, I'm gonna live like one.   
9 Comments

Flowers

6/24/2023

5 Comments

 
Picture
"I can buy myself flowers," warbles Miley Cyrus in her new song.

​I've never heard Miley Cyrus' "Flowers" all the way through, but I have heard the chorus; and beyond the saccharine insipidity of the music itself, the lyrics bothered me enough for me to think about why, and to look up the lyrics for the entire song.

They reek of cope, as the kids might say, but more than that what bothers me are the larger implications of this tripe being held up as a feminine empowerment anthem. 

The song is clearly about her ex-husband. The notes under the lyrics on the site I used state that Cyrus released it on his birthday. Writing songs about an ex and being petty about it isn't anything unusual for a singer, and writing bad songs certainly isn't unusual for the shills who put a face to the radio propaganda that currently passes for pop music. What bothers me so much about this song are the larger implications I see in it.

There are only a few lines about her sorrow over the end of the relationship; most of the song focuses on her and her ability to take care of herself.  

But Miley, that was never the point.

Marriage is supposed to be different, supposed to be distinctive among your relationships. Divorce isn't like- or isn't supposed to be like- you and your boyfriend deciding to go your separate ways. Divorce is the death of a home, the future you might have had together, what the two of you could have built together if you could've worked things out.  Divorce is the death of the family you might have had.

It's something worthy of grief.  That heartbreak is worth more than a couple of throwaway lines in the middle of a bunch of feminist talking points parroted to make you feel better about your life, your breakup, and yourself.  

As an old maid who had always assumed I'd be a housewife and mother, who assumed that that life would just fall into my lap as it did for my mother and friends and forebears, let me tell you: that is a dangerous assumption. You can't count on finding a soulmate. You can't just assume you'll fall in love.

I'm not saying marriage or a romantic relationship is the end- all be- all of a woman's life. If I were willing to raise a child on my own, I could find a man to use to conceive one with little trouble. If I were willing to be in a romantic relationship just for its own sake, I could have a boyfriend probably within a week, even at my age.

But I've seen what true love looks like.  I have seen what good, stable marriages look like.  I am not willing to settle for anything less.  

That kind of love, commitment, and devotion should not be taken lightly.  The good marriages, the ones that last a lifetime, the ones that bring out the best in both spouses- that's arguably the pinnacle of human experience.  

The lyrics of "Flowers" are as much an insult to someone who values what romantic love and marriage should be as the "music" is to the ears.

I will most likely spend my life alone and die unmarried and childless.  This is something I've had to come to terms with; I would've been a good wife and a good mother.  The loss of that life, of who I could have been, is worthy of grief even if I don't regret it.

Sure, I can buy myself flowers.  I can take myself to the beach, or the woods.  I'm strong enough to stand on my own, to build a lovely home and a good life for myself.  Even without romance, I have family and I am well loved.

But that strength has been won at the cost of loneliness.  I am no one's priority.  I have no children to take care of me in my old age; I'll have to figure that out on my own, and the fact that I would rather be dead than dependent is as much a necessity as it is a preference.  

Part of the reason I despise feminism so much and hate the girl-boss trope is because I am both the target demographic and an easily- misinterpreted example. I knew better, in my twenties, than to believe the feminist propaganda, but so many girls don't.  I knew, in my twenties, how fleeting my fertility was, how quickly that clock was running down.  Most young women don't.  

Even in my twenties, I knew the value of men.  Most girls don't, because they are now taught not to.

And this, really, is the heart of my problem with "Flowers."  Even if you don't need romance to build a good, fulfilling, successful life (I haven't), the value of it deserves to be acknowledged.

​Spinsterhood is not some great victory, Miley.
5 Comments

Being a Lady

6/4/2023

4 Comments

 
Picture
"I don't want to be a lady!" I shrieked in my father's face, and at the time I meant it.

My idea of a "lady" looked mostly like my grandmothers, and none more than Grandmama.

Grandmama, with her iron self control. Grandmama, the one adult whom I never, ever dared try. Grandmama, from whom I never heard the words, "I love you," to me or anyone else, even as a response when someone else said it first.  Grandmama, who I can't remember ever laughing, though I know she must have.

I still don't want to be a lady like that.  

But what I failed to realize as an angry teenager was that there is not just one way to be a lady. Grandmama's borderline inhuman self control and impeccable manners are inarguably ladylike - so long as the ones arguing can agree on terms rooted in reality - but Grandmama was not the be- all and end- all of what a lady is.

After all, I had other grandmothers; and as much as Grandmama was a Grand Dame of the South, so too were Granny and Mimi.  

And weren't Granny's gentleness and faith ladylike? Weren't Mimi's beauty and charm ladylike?

I came to realize that the key was to gracefully accept and emulate the best of my grandmothers, and to improve upon and surpass their flaws - just like any other part of my heritage.  

To use beauty and charm as valuable tools, as my Mimi did - but without relying on them as a crutch.  To know how to be gentle, and to pray in times of trouble as Granny did - but without the years of abuse it took her to get there.  To know the value of manners as Grandmama did- but to know when to put their shield aside and be vulnerable, as I never, ever saw her do.  That's the kind of lady I try to be.  

And it's paid off.  

Though I work in a male-dominated field, I've never seen the rampant misogyny about which the feminists love to shriek.  And while I have encountered misogyny, it was never from the men from whom I was told to expect it. The most workplace misogyny I ever saw or experienced was from a gay man working in a grocery store bakery.  

In almost two decades of retail and blue collar working experience, and in a lifetime of interacting with others, I have found that nothing earns a woman more respect and goodwill than when she acts like a lady.

So what do I mean by that?

Not sleeping around, for one. (At first I thought it was just the place where I was working, but now I think it's that people are Just That Way, at least post 1960s "sexual revolution").  I've had a few friends and acquaintances who are undeniably sluts, no matter whether you consider that a pejorative or not - women who either engaged in casual sex or bedded men not married to them. I don't know that any of them fully realize how much respect they lost from others by their conduct.  

Is it really so difficult to keep your legs closed?

And then there are women - too many of whom are handed a microphone - who deny biological reality - women who insist that they are the same as men, women who venerate the word "equality" and pervert its meaning at every opportunity. It is prudent to avoid these women as the threats they are, but it's horrifically amazing to see the sheer hubris of a woman who can fail physical ability tests again and again, then insist that standards be lowered, and then to refuse to admit that she wants the standards lowered because she wants a title she hasn't earned!

But then, why wouldn't she, when she's been told all her life that Girls Rule, that she's Special, that she can do and be whatever she wants?  What chance do biology and reality stand against a lifetime of ideological coaching and the looming shadow of every single societal institution?

She may find it reassuring that she can steal the title, but it won't earn her the respect of the men with whom she works.  If she ever gains the least scintilla of humility and wants to earn their respect, the only way for her to do so is through admitting her fault, years of hard work, staying quiet unless and until she has something of actual value to contribute, and helping others without any expectation or demand of recompense.

In other words, the opposite of what got her there in the first place.

Seeing how many of them there are and the lofty heights to which they can climb in any organization they infest (largely in administrative roles, you'll note), it's easy to get discouraged. An ambitious woman who happens to have integrity and self respect might be forgiven for considering adopting their methods and rationalizing using those tactics by telling herself that she's just playing the game to win.

My dear, it's not worth it.

The women who sleep their way to the top, or those who get there by backstabbing, stealing credit, lying, or plying whatever diversity cards they hold - unless they're psychopaths - they're miserable.  These are the ones who make up those statistics about SSRI use and depression, and who make up the stereotype about Millennial spinsters or divorcees and their cats and box wine.  

They're hollowed-out husks of people, with shallow, screaming eyes when you look closely (and you won't be able to look closely for long; there's something uncanny about them).  They're pathetic creatures, and there's somewhere between little and nothing in them worth emulating.  

But when a woman carries herself with self respect; when she's polite, hardworking, and sincere; when she honestly acknowledges both her strengths and her faults, and takes them into account; when she thanks those who offer her help in the same spirit in which it was offered, even when she didn't need it; when she refrains from gossip, especially malicious gossip; when she does her best to take care of those around her even when she doesn't particularly like them; all of these things are ladylike, and every single one of them earns respect.

And while it may be difficult, every single one of them is achievable even in toxic work environments.  Sometimes it means keeping your head down and your mouth shut; sometimes it means using knowledge strategically; most often it means knowing when to leave. (The time to leave, by the by, is always before you're trapped or tricked into doing something unethical or illegal- because if you let them maneuver you into that, you're seating yourself under a sword of Damocles.)

Wisdom and good judgment are also ladylike.

A woman is an adult human female; being a woman is not an accomplishment, since all it takes is being born that way.  But to be a lady is to choose to be a good woman, to be the best woman that you can.  Continually making that choice is worthy of respect.

​​​​​​​Turns out I'd rather be a lady after all.
4 Comments

Do Not Despair

3/26/2023

5 Comments

 
Picture

It's hard not to get blackpilled.

Seemingly anywhere you look, Rome is burning.  The cost of living only seems to go up, savings keep going down, our rulers' hatred of us is ever more apparent, and there's at least a year and a half more of this before there's a reasonable hope of even marginal improvement.  

It's hard not to get blackpilled, but you shouldn't.  

I know.  It's not that easy, right?  It takes far more effort to leave a rut than to fall into one, and most of the time you need a helping hand up.

Well, here's mine.

The best way I've found to address anxiety or fear around a problem is to do something about it. So I can't destroy the Fed (or the universities, or the bureaucracy, or the mainstream media, or mainstream social media, or any number of other evils).  So I can't revoke the 16th, 17th, or 19th Amendments.  So I'm not rich.  So what?

I can start a garden.  I can cook and clean.  I can plan projects to make my home better insulated and prettier. I might need to rethink some of the organization of it, too, to make it more functional.  

I can take care of this kitten that wandered up to my little sister's house (and that she subsequently decided needed to be my problem, since I committed the great sin of petting him).  I can look for a better home for him, one without a middle aged cat who keeps hissing at him for no better reason than him existing in her space, and enjoy his company in the meantime.  

(That's another great method of combating stress, by the way; pet a friendly, furry animal. No creature on this earth will ever or could ever love you the way a dog does, and a purring cat is one of life's great joys.)

I can ask my friend who knows how to sew to teach me what she can.  I can help those neighbors and coworkers who are worthy, and my friends, and my family, as best I can.  I can make a habit of improving things around me, to the point that when I walk in people who know me see my face, breathe a sigh of relief, and say," Oh, thank God, she's here."

That choice - that continuous, small choice to do what you can to make things better around you - has an outsized impact.  A friend was once giving me a ride and we wound up in a traffic jam on the Interstate.  She hadn't gotten gas when she should have, so we had to turn off the car- there on the road, fully in the sweltering Florida summer sun. 

She was apologetic. It would've been easier to be mad- but instead I chose to smile at her, thanked her for giving me a ride, and we picked wildflowers off the side of the road.  

She brought it up years later; what could have been a bad memory instead was a good one, and all it took was a small choice - a deliberate framing of the situation on my part - to redeem it.

And it is this, more than anything else, that we can do to make things better.  Your reach is limited.  That's fine!  You'll do the most good for the people you love most by bettering yourself and improving things around you.  So what if that's small? Everything is, if you zoom out enough.  The very galaxy this planet is in is small compared to the vastness of space.  That doesn't mean it doesn't matter.

The size of the things you can do matter less than the fact that you do them.  The limit of your reach matters less than how you use it.  The impact of your choices- the full extent of which it is humanly impossible to know- do matter, and they'll matter the most to the people closest to you.

Maybe it sounds trite. Maybe it seems insipid. I don't much care, because I've lived long enough and seen enough to know that I am not wrong when I tell you: there are many things you can't change, but one thing you can change is yourself.  You can continually choose to be a better person.  

Start there.
5 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    Millennial spinster inflicted upon the Gulf Southeast as a harbinger.

    Archives

    September 2026
    April 2024
    March 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    August 2023
    June 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023

Proudly powered by Weebly