RECKONIN'
  • Features
    • Book Bench
    • Charlottesville
    • COVID Commentary
    • Dixie These Days
    • Links
    • Magnolia Muse
    • Matters of Faith
    • Movie Room
    • Southern History
    • Writing Contest 2022
  • Contributors
    • Full List
    • Mark Atkins
    • Al Benson
    • Carolina Contrarian
    • Enoch Cade
    • Boyd Cathey
    • Dissident Mama
    • Ted Ehmann
    • Walt Garlington
    • Gail Jarvis
    • Gene Kizer, Jr.
    • Neil Kumar
    • Perrin Lovett
    • Ilana Mercer
    • Tom Riley
    • H.V. Traywick, Jr.
    • Clyde Wilson
  • Contact
  • Features
    • Book Bench
    • Charlottesville
    • COVID Commentary
    • Dixie These Days
    • Links
    • Magnolia Muse
    • Matters of Faith
    • Movie Room
    • Southern History
    • Writing Contest 2022
  • Contributors
    • Full List
    • Mark Atkins
    • Al Benson
    • Carolina Contrarian
    • Enoch Cade
    • Boyd Cathey
    • Dissident Mama
    • Ted Ehmann
    • Walt Garlington
    • Gail Jarvis
    • Gene Kizer, Jr.
    • Neil Kumar
    • Perrin Lovett
    • Ilana Mercer
    • Tom Riley
    • H.V. Traywick, Jr.
    • Clyde Wilson
  • Contact

                 Ilana Mercer

Systemic Racism or Systemic Rubbish?

8/8/2020

4 Comments

 
Picture

The "systemic racism" refrain is a meaningless abstraction.

To concretize a variable, it must be cast in empirical, measurable terms, the opaque “racism” abstraction being one variable (to use statistical nomenclature).

Until you have meticulously applied research methodology to statistically operationalize this inchoate thing called "racism"—systemic or other—it remains nothing but a thought “crime”: Impolite and impolitic thoughts, spoken, written or preached.  

Thought crimes are nobody's business in a free society. 

The law already mandates that people of all races be treated equally under its protection. The law, then, is not the problem, logic is. In particular, the logical error of reasoning backward. 

“Backward reasoning, expounded by mystery author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle through his famous fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes,” writes Dr. Thomas Young, “applies with reasonable certainty when only one plausible explanation for the … evidence exists.”

Systemic racism is most certainly not “the only plausible explanation” for the lag in the fortunes of African-Americans, although, as it stands, systemic racism is inferred solely from one single fact: In aggregate, African-Americans trail behind whites in assorted academic and socio-economic indices and achievements. 

This logical error is the central tenet of preferential treatment—affirmative action, and assorted quotas and set-aside edicts and policies. 

According to diversity doxology, justice is achieved only when racial and ethnic groups are reflected in academia and in the professions in proportion to their presence in the larger population. On indices of economic well-being, the same egalitarian outcomes are sought. 

Equalizing individual and inter-group outcomes is an impossibility considering that it is axiomatically and self-evidently true to say that differences have existed since the dawn of time.

Nevertheless, absent such wealth egalitarianism and proportional representation in the professions, the walking wounded who control America’s cultural discourse have concluded that racism, systemic or other, reigns.

The systemic racism non sequitur is even harder to sustain when considering the Asian minority, a minority that has had its own historical hardships. In professions and academic pursuits where mathematical precocity is a factor, Asians are overrepresented, consistently outperforming whites. If proportional underrepresentation signals oppression, then overrepresentation, likewise, must reflect an unfair advantage. 

And if social justice requires that the State and corporate America act as social and economic levelers—then surely fairness demands that all minority groups that are overrepresented in assorted endeavors be similarly kneecapped in the name of equality? Should not such leveling policies be deployed to make the NBA or the 100-meter dash more “representative” of America?

High among Corporate America’s priorities is acting as a race leveler—voluntarily sniffing out deviationists and generally proceeding against and “re-educating” pay-dependent prey. Corporate America’s human resource departments are in the habit of deluging employees with the racial agitprop of illiterate (if degreed) pamphleteers. The woman who wrote White Fragility comes to mind.

In a workplace so shot through with hatred of whites, quite foreseeable is a form of intellectual reparations, where the designated white “oppressors” labor behind the scenes, while the officially “oppressed” manage them and take credit for their intellectual output.

As recounted in Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for American From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011, p. 103), the African National Congress has pioneered “the creation of a unique cognitive caste system.” 

Throughout the South African work force, "white subordinates with graduate and postgraduate degrees are doing the hard-core intellectual and technical work for their black bosses. The latter often have no more than a tenth-grade diploma but are paid a great deal more than their intellectual skivvies. A black matriculant (possessor of a high-school diploma) is perfectly poised to climb the South African corporate structure; yet, in order to have a ghost of a chance at remaining employed, a white had better possess the Masters or the Ph.D. degree. Given their pallor, promotion for whites is less and less likely."

Unlike systemic racism, intellectual indentureship could quickly become a reality in America.
This piece was previously published on August 7, 2020 at IlanaMercer.com.
4 Comments
Daithi Dubh
8/9/2020 06:38:10 am

You're using logic and reason, Miss Ilana, and that's simply intolerable!

Reality will once again assert itself, but how much damage will be done before that happens?

Reply
Weezie
8/11/2020 04:32:40 pm

I’ve been trying to find “racism” in a catholic catechism (I don’t recognize the JPII one) and its just not there. The closest I can find is prejudice. Early training to judge something before you have examined it. But the different races have been thoroughly examined.

The dictionary says racism is discriminating against someone of a different race. That means if a 100 lbs white woman crosses the street at dusk in a big city when approached by 3 black men, strutting around and blocking the way, that she is a racist by judging that she should take precautions.

Now, HATRED of people is strictly forbidden by the Church, but you don’t hate someone if you discriminate against them. You make a judgment.


I think this needs serous study by smarter ones than I, but I wonder when the term “racism” even was coined? I know pius XII says that one MUST have more affection for his own family than to others. THats means preferring your own.

Reply
Anna
9/19/2020 07:11:02 pm

Some one once said, “The issue is never the issue, the revolution is always the issue.” This civil rights and Black Lives and “systemic racism” is also just an artificial issue, used by the financiers to foment a revolution—look at the Republic of Georgia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, the Arab Spring, Venezuela— don’t think it won’t happen here, because that is exactly what is happening. We may be as tough a nut to crack as Syria, but I doubt it. I think that 90 percent of Americans are pansies, and would roll over for bread and circuses. The other 10 percent (probably closer to 1 percent) will be impossible to defeat, but are so scattered over the land that they will be not worth trying to defeat unless they cause a ruckus—and then defeated (brutally killed) in a big show to deter others. I may be wrong and hope I am. I do know that there are a lot of deplorables who are armed and dangerous and would rally quickly to fight oppression, but I don’t know if they have courage and character to stand up for what is right, if it were to cost them their way of life.

Reply
liana link
11/7/2022 10:32:06 pm

thanks for info

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian column since 1999. She is the author of “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa”(2011) & “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed” (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Facebook, Gab & YouTube
    Read more by Ilana Mercer on her website, www.ilanamercer.com

    Archives

    March 2023
    July 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018

Proudly powered by Weebly