The Social Justice Warriors who claim that our society is dominated by “whiteness” have a point.  It is something intangible in the social atmosphere.  It is unintended and unconscious.  It reflects a very plain fact.  We live in Western Civilisation, the greatest achievement so far of humanity, which was created by white people. You might expect other peoples to show gratitude for participating in its benefits instead of malice.

Wondering:  Have millions of people wearing masks saved a single life?

For years now I have been hearing people whine that the Democrats have taken over the elections with immigration and fraud and the Republicans will never win another election.  So what?  What do you think Mitt, Marco, Kevin, Jeb, Nikki, Michael, Linsey, etc. will do for you if they are elected?  The Republican party is not an opposition party, it is merely a collection of politicians hoping for office.  Killing off the Republicans will have the positive effect of making room for a real opposition party or parties.

Joe Biden is a museum quality specimen of a political hack.  He has fed at the federal trough for decades, representing a rotten borough, without ever having a real thought about what is right for his country.  He always says what he thinks  people want to hear.  True or false or concern for the consequences never  comes  into it.  Founding Americans would weep with sorrow at such a place-holder ruling the people.

Politics is not the realm of doing good.  Millions of insipid, shallow Americans seem to believe that foolishness.  Politics is the realm of power, vanity, greed, and deceit.

The hysteria over the demise of George Floyd exposes the dream world and fear of reality of too many Americans.  You can almost forgive Europeans because their idea of America is sheriffs walking around with big revolvers.  But the Americans refuse to accept the plain reality of what it takes to subdue violent criminals in the big cities today.  Though the end result was unfortunate, the Floyd arrest was otherwise no different from what is necessary every day in many places.

Today’s “news reporters”  are quite literally unable to distinguish between a fact and their own self-centered feelings.  And unable to distinguish between an objectively important issue and a fashionable one.  Not to mention that they seem unanimously to suffer from the curse of “a little learning” causing them to think they are of superior wisdom.

Doesn’t it seem to you that our armed forces are now ruled not by soldiers but by ass-kissers and back-stabbers who have successfully climbed the greasy bureaucratic pole? 

The billions spent on the armed forces have very little to do with the actual defense of the American people.

What would the men of Guadalcanal and Normandy think of today’s  America?  I am quite sure they would consider their sacrifice wasted.

Enlightened people know that it is an atrocity that the capital of America is named for the racist slaveholder Washington.  That name is an almost daily offense to good people around the world.  Fortunately, progressive voices in Congress are beginning to pay attention to this problem.  Of new names, King City or MLK City seem to have the most support, although there are also supporters of Obama City, Floyd City, and Tubman City  who will have their say. Tubman City would be satisfactory for both African-Americans and feminists.

Of course, some of the most backward Republicans who claim they are not racists  are already complaining that a changeover will be too expensive.

Along with this change there must be a reconfiguration of the Washington Monument to reflect the  true America.  It is hard to imagine any more offensive symbol of white privilege. Whether it should be redecorated to reflect  black or rainbow sensibilities remains to be decided.  Perhaps a redecoration could embody both causes.

A lot is being done to erase America’s evil racist past. The destruction of heinous Confederate symbols is well under way, but much more needs to be done.  The memorial to the racist slaveowner Jefferson could be demolished to make place for a new monument to African-American contributions to America.

The North is not immune, but much remains to be done in the South.  Virginia has been taking some steps, but that is only a beginning.   What could be better than renaming Washington and Lee University for George Floyd as a symbol of repudiation of the flawed American past and the search for enlightened knowledge?  And the College of William Mary, instead of being named for two oppressive colonialists, can be named Nat Turner University in honor of the great Virginian who struck one of the first blows against slavery.  The Virginia Military Institute, long a bastion of unmitigated evil, should be renamed for President Grant, a great soldier and true friend of African Americans.

Perhaps the greatest need for cleansing is to be found in South Carolina.  The college named for the Confederate racist slaveholder Clemson might memorialise instead Denmark Vesey, who was martyred for rebellion against slavery.  And the college called The Citadel should be called the Sherman Military Institute after the great commander who liberated that state from oppression.

Of course, we still have a long way to go in cleansing the evil past.  Last time I looked there is still a “Calhoun County” in Michigan, as well as many counties,  towns and streets in the South carrying that name and other racist designations.  And why are the names of notorious racist oppressors of peaceful Hispanic Americans like Houston, Austin, and Jackson still offending?

America geography is studded with names from the languages of Native Americans, often with distorted meanings and spellings---Ohio, Iowa, Minneapolis, Miami, Milwaukee, Omaha, Seattle and countless others.  These are clearly the product of white oppression and cultural appropriation of a conquered people.  There should be a Presidential commission to decide to what degree these place names should remain as recognition of  Native Americans as the original Americans, or should be abolished or changed.

​We should all remember that in our struggle against white privilege we are still a long way from declaring “Mission Accomplished.”

If you are one of us Deplorables, you should recognize that the people who control the United States today have no interest in your wellbeing.  They hate and fear you and want you to disappear.

No important politician will address the issues that effect you most. 

Your next President will be an immigrant anchor baby whose position has been achieved by political corruption and who hates you and your country.

America is now a post-Western society.  If a hallmark of Western civilization is recognizing real evidence and logical reasoning, then just listen to the ideological drivel coming out of the mouths of Presidents and other high personages and pervasively from the media of communication.

America is now a post-Christian country.  There is not a single major issue in which traditional Christianity has any effect.  Just listen to the drivel coming from the mouths of the higher clergy and many of their subordinates.

We millions of deplorables are all that is left of the genuine American people and we are powerless, over our fate and even over our daily lives.

One has been murdered and some of us are being held by the government as political prisoners for peacefully walking through what used to be  the people’s Capitol.

The courts no longer administer justice.  They serve the interests of money and Wokeness.  You have next to no hope of justice against money.

Fear is now a commonplace part of our lives.  We are afraid to say what we really think.  We are afraid of acting in self-defense against government pets because we are likely to be treated as  criminals. 

It is only a matter of time until our Social Security and Medicare are diminished to facilitate expenditures for more favoured causes.

The Republican party is not and never has been “conservative.”  It is has never in its entire history conserved anything valuable to us.  Its leaders regard us as useless Deplorables just as surely as do Obama and Hillary Clinton.  The Republican party represents nothing except great wealth and its office-holders and aspiring office-holders.

You have the best Congress that money can buy.

Your multi-billion dollar Department of Defense does not defend you or our homeland.  A vast majority of the discussion, expenditure, and action of the armed forces consists of the business of imposing will on or attacking other countries. Don’t think that the U.S. government is omnipotent or that retribution has become absent from the universe.

Can a country that has over 100 military bases across the globe and that routinely drops explosive drone rockets on civilians be considered either as democratic or Christian?

The Defense Department exists for corporate welfare, the agenda of transnational finance, and the insane delusion of our ruling class of enforcing “global democracy.” 

​American popular culture was for a long time comfortably middle-brow.  Now it both trivial and depraved.  Your children and grandchildren, given the evil educational establishment and electronic immersion, will never be exposed to Western civilization unless you do it yourself.

​Who won the Cold War? The Communists or the Capitalists?  Actually, they both have won it.  There was never that much difference between them to begin with, which was a central message of the Southern Agrarians almost a century ago. The Communist/Capitalists now are the U.S. regime.  They have been converging for many years and are now completely consolidated and completely in control.

The capitalists (the bankers and stockjobbers, to use the terminology of early Americans) now control a vast and ever increasing share of the wealth while the workers get poorer and poorer. Capitalists serve the purposes of the Communists and even bankroll them.

Nobody seems to have pointed out  that the Biden regime resembles the Leninist takeover of Russia. That was in the midst of a war that had made people brutal, so the takeover was more violent than presently (so far). Both give major effort to censoring anti-regime ideas and organisations. Both are the product of the take-over or suppression of all institutions. Both have an ideology that is a fantasy but is rigidly enforced.   Both use the mob whenever it is useful to them.
​
Both hold us basket of deplorables in contempt as useless and expendable. The regime in power cares no more about the rank and file of Americans than Lenin and Trotsky cared about the 2 million or more farmers that Lenin and Trotsky exterminated in the  early 1930s. This contempt for the masses arises in both cases, American and Soviet, from the urban pseudo-intellectual class of party faithful who think of themselves as superior to the ordinary. Stalin even purged the armed forces of potential enemies of the regime, something the present rulers intend.

There is one difference. The Soviets claimed to be committing their crimes on behalf of the proletariat, the working class.  In the rugged conditions of early industrialism the workers seemed ripe fruit for manning revolution. Of course, they were soon  reduced to slave labour conditions, while the party officials enjoyed whatever fruits were available.

Now the Communists have completely abandoned the excuse of the proletariat. Now it is the minorities they have mobilised  to destroy society. The Bidenites are still working out of the same Leninist playbook, but with different clients. This tells us that Communism was never about uplifting the downtrodden. It was motivated by a destructive hatred  of Western Civilisation. George W. Bush and Joe Biden hardly differ at all in their Trotskyite version of the future.

The West mobilised vast resources against the Soviet military threat and lived anxiously through the Cold War. American lives and treasure were sacrificed in Korea and Vietnam and little tykes like Yours Truly were taught to hide under their desks in case of nuclear attack.

Curiously, during all this time, American “intelligentsia” remained strongly anti-anti-communist. They harassed and blocked and even destroyed investigators of Communist subversion like McCarthy and Nixon and defended Soviet agents like Hiss to almost the last ditch. They promoted unilateral Western disarmament and sympathised  with North Vietnam while it killed Americans and its own people. They always gave Russia the benefit of the doubt.  
 
The recent opening of the Russian archives has revealed that the investigators of  Communist subversion  were correct but guilty of vast understatement. It is now apparent the the U.S. government, under Communist agents and fellow travelers from the early 1930s,  did everything possible for the benefit of the Soviet Union at the expense of America and that they made possible the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe and  the speed-up of Russian acquisition of nuclear weapons.  

But now, most curiously, since Russia has become non-Communist the same deep thinkers hate it and accuse it of all kinds of aggression. This reveals their true nature, because it can only be motivated by hatred of Russia’s redirection toward social conservatism and Christianity.

Imagine what a Presidential “press conference” might look like if the U.S. had real journalists. Imagine the answers. Or even a real system of debate where the Prime Minister has to answer questions from the Opposition. Or even if we had a real Opposition party.

Q. Mr. President, millions of Americans feel that you were elected unfairly.  What do you say to them?

Q.  Don’t you think it may be too much for the U.S. to be challenging both China and Russia at the same time?

Q. To follow up, many people don’t understand your freely expressed antagonism to Russia.  After all, investigation proved they did not interfere in our election.

Q. Americans like to think we have the greatest military in the world.  Some analysts think we are over-estimating our capacity.  What do you think of the claim that our aircraft carriers, on which we place great reliance, are now actually sitting ducks because of new missile technologies?  If so, what should we do about it?

Q.  George Floyd had a gold casket and three funerals.  Millions of dollars have been contributed in his name and he has become a kind of saint.  Do you think maybe this response is unjustified for a lifelong, dangerous,  heavily drugged felon?  Do you think that the policeman involved in making Floyd’s arrest can ever receive a fair trial since he has already been convicted by the press and politicians?  Are there plans to file federal charges against the officer?

Q, We now hear a lot of discussion of “a crisis at the border.”  What caused this and what can we do about it?   Do you credit the reports that the new border policy has empowered drug cartels and human traffickers?

Q. In your opinion, is there any such thing as an “illegal alien”?  Is crossing our border illegally a crime?

Q. Polls have shown for years that American citizens are not in favour of the high levels of immigration that the government has sponsored for several decades now.   Perhaps so vital an issue should be put to the people to decide, as has been suggested in France? 

Q.  Why do you think 75 million people voted for your opponent in the election?  Are these all dangerous extremists that need to be purged from American society, as many of your supporters say? 

Q.  Critical Race Theory is now widely sponsored by your administration.  Have you studied this theory?  Can you explain to the public what you understand about it? 

For millions of Americans President Trump has become the symbol, voice, and hope of saving their America  from  ongoing destruction.  Though the hope he raised remains spectacularly unfulfilled, he is still its recognized  representative.  Possibly his presence is now an obstacle to his program, but that can’t be helped.  There is no other populist  in sight with any significance, nor is the present Republican party likely to produce another one.

It is perhaps fair to say that Trump’s public role  has sometimes reflected more ego  than principle - he has shown more allegiance to his family and cronies than to his “people.”

There are two things that Trump could do now that would prominently show his leadership and care for those who follow him.  He has the funds to begin this and these efforts would soon attract other support.
​

• A legal protection organization for the hundreds of people who have now been doxed, fired, prosecuted, and imprisoned for opposing the present regime, almost all of whom are his supporters, left to fight on their own against the vast apparatus of the government and its vigilantes.  Such an organization, with truly skilled and dedicated lawyers, could also bring to bear   the civil courts against such violent groups as antifa and BLM, an opportunity that the Trump administration failed to pursue.  This would both enlighten the public and protect his “people.”

• A television and online news network. The whole apparatus of commercial TV is not needed. Start simply  with a broadcast of two or three hours each evening presenting the real news. Imagine getting out to the public the facts about the border, urban crime, Biden confusion, and academic insanity.  This would soon virtually destroy the power of the mainstream media. Such an effort would not be prohibitively expensive. Avoid all commercial connection and Republican party line.  There would be one major problem to overcome: finding the right people to do the job. The media culture is totally corrupt and existing personnel at the higher levels would have to be avoided entirely. Alas, finding the right people is not Trump’s strong point.

It seems evident that Trump  has never realized the  deadly ideological nature of the battle he is in - something more fundamental than personality and policy tinkering.  We can only hope that experience has brought him understanding.

Almost everybody assumes that Kamala Harris will succeed Joe Biden as President, perhaps before the end of his term.

If so, she will be the first woman President and the first Asian-American President, with extra credit for being the second African  “American” President.

​They don’t mention that she is the first Anchor Baby President, the first President with no American background at all.  Her mother came from India in 1958 as a student and stayed.  Her father came from Jamaica as a student in 1961 and stayed. The mother is a high caste Indian—that is, comes from the most racially discriminatory group in the world, who cannot even be touched by inferiors.  Her black father brags that his people were not slaves but slave owners.

Neither Obama nor Kamala is an “African American” in a genuine sense.  Why are they considered such?  What about the long-suffering real African-Americans whose forebears have been here longer than most Yankees’?  With good and really enforced immigration law, Kamala might not even be a citizen.  As it is, she kept in touch with her foreign relatives and also lived in Canada for several years. 

Most Presidents have descended from families that were here even before the United States appeared. Washington and Adams were already the third generation in America. All Presidents have had at least two generations of native-born behind them.

What happened to Americans?  We are starting to resemble the  corrupt  days of the Roman Empire when foreigners regularly became Emperors.

Then there is the  ‘Squad ‘  in the House of Representatives, with gushingly laudatory biographies on Wikepedia.  There is  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, born in New York City to Puerto Rican parents.  She is determined to re-educate or eliminate me whose family on both sides were here in the 1600s.  And Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a Moslem born in Somalia, whose attainment of citizenship has been questioned.  And Rashida Tlaib, born in Detroit to Palestinian immigrants.
One hears Republicans with their usual short-sightedness complaining about the appearance of these leftist termagants with national influence.  If only Nixon, Reagan, and the Bushes had sponsored and enforced good immigration laws, we may never have heard of these folks.

And, of course, it used to be taken for granted that a President had a substantial record of public service as good citizen, Governor, Senator, or general.  Obama was excused from this requirement.  At least he had a demeanour and a patter that pleased a lot of people.  The fall from George Washington to U.S. Grant was catastrophic.  The fall from U.S. Grant to Kamala Harris beggars belief.

The United States began as a republican confederation. With Appomattox it came a consolidated regime the most important symbol of which was $. With conquest and occupation of the Southern states the ruling element began to get a taste for empire, which Europe seemed to demonstrate to be a profitable affair. Thus annexation of Hawaii and the Philippines and various interventions in Latin America and Asia. World War I created a widespread anti-imperial reaction. The instincts and institutions of republicanism continued to have some hold on the people.

World War II and the Cold War completed American conversion into an imperial state, possessing of a worldwide empire, with bases and client states across the globe. (Imperialism is always covered with blather about spreading  “democracy,” whatever that means.) There has never been in history an empire with leaders as flabby, arrogant, unpatriotic, and clueless as the American ruling class. Their empire is bound to be challenged by other rising powers, in response to which they likely will create events disastrous to humanity---the extent of which will be only limited by their incompetence and delusions.

Empires do not have citizens. They have subjects. The bizarre events of recent times are part of  solidifying  the empire internally. We are all being made into subjects, although some subjects are more favoured than others. The Bidenites may well succeed in their project. If so, what will be left will be a regime that no civilised person can love.  

Speaker Pelosi is reported as saying that the folks who got into the Capitol building the other day want to destroy “democracy” and substitute “whiteness.”  On the face of it this is a lie, since the protestors were not advocating anything particularly white but asking for redress for an election stolen by people mostly white.

Democracy is a troublesome term always.  A reasonable definition would be a regime in which citizens are  equally free  and decisions are made peacefully by majority rule.  But Pelosi’s “democracy” is a bit strange.  There is democracy only when her viewpoint is the only one allowed.  The 74 million who voted for Trump for President are not members of her democracy, but enemies who must be eliminated or re-educated and have no equal right to talk to their rulers.  In fact, her “democracy” is an ideological fantasy that does not exist in the real world and can only be attempted by coercion (which is already being publicly promoted). Sounds like the Chinese Communist Party, without the Chinese constructive pragmatism.

Being white is real, but “Whiteness” too is an ideological concept.  Is whiteness an enemy of democracy? Can you think of any nonwhite country other than Japan that qualifies as genuinely democratic? There are many things that Trump supporters might be accused of, but she resorts to “whiteness” as their greatest sin because of the moral charge connected with any hint of mistreatment of nonwhite people. And if we cannot help being white, shouldn’t she show us a little sympathy rather than extreme malice?

Republican leader McConnell tops Pelosi in dishonesty and stupidity, impossible as that seems.  He said he is forwarding Trump’s impeachment because he wants to save the GOP by purging Trump and Make American Great Again.  (Presumably, if he is actually convicted of “high crimes,”  Trump will not be able to run next time.) Mitch wants to get back to the old comfortable self-serving party rule and pre-Trump business as usual.  But what GOP is he saving?  Does he think that the 74 million people who voted for Trump will rush back into the arms of Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney?  He shows not only contempt for the 74 million but also a cluelessness that qualifies as stupid.  Reminds me of a snake swallowing his tail.

There was a time when exercisers of high government power were expected to have done something worthwhile or at least have long experience in office.  Even if not perfectly honest they had some knowledge of  large human affairs and competence in handling them.

Madame Pelosi has never in a long life done anything notable, much less distinguished.  Her knowledge of history is adolescent. McConnell has never shown any accomplishment or wisdom in anything beyond political party tactics. Their world is limited to the corridors of power.  They are courtiers, not by any stretch of the imagination leaders. Not a single congressperson had the courage or initiative to leave their cocoon and listen to a mostly peaceful if angry  group of citizens. They are too elite and virtuous to be held to account for their actions.

Then there is Kamala Harris, without any achievement or worthwhile distinction or even experience, soon to exercise the immense power of the Yankee Empire, heavy with potential for destruction within and without. Can you imagine her, or even Biden, going up against the wily and patriotic leaders of China, or Russia, or even Iran?

But, not to worry, we still have the best government money can buy.